Since the start of the 90s so few fighters have more than one or two great wins

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

LMAo at Pavlik and Tarver for Hopkins.

[winac]

pretty much agree with the list, except for Mayweather, come on now, he has had good wins.

Yes he has but I am only talking about the oes against great fighters in their primes

[Dan...]

Okay well I am going on whether someone has a win in the official record books. The first man to beat a shell of Roy Jones is surely great but if that is your opinion fair enough

Fixed it for you.

And Griffin was the first man to beat Roy Jones.

[winac]

LMAo at Pavlik and Tarver for Hopkins.

Okay, eventhough he was unified middleweight champ I will give you that but I ain't agreeing on Tarver. The pavlik win was more to do with the age of bernard

[MANGLER]

If a win can only be considered great if it's scored against a great fighter, no wonder there's so few. By this criteria it's easy to **** on a fighter's res cuz truly great fighters are rare.

[MoneyMayFan]

And pavlik is not great either

[MoneyMayFan]

And just because tarver beat roy 3 times(IMO he won that first fight) dont mean he great..**** dat

[winac]

And pavlik is not great either

Edited it, I guess that win was more circumstantial

[MoneyMayFan]

Is holyfield great?..cause toney beat him..(yeah i know holyfield old)

[savorduhflavor]

Cotto over Mosley.

I know Mosley was definitely a little past his prime, but I mean he showed he's still got it against Margarito. I still think that is a great win.