Answer me this klit fans.

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Savino
    Slaughterhouse
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 7533
    • 390
    • 246
    • 16,452

    #11
    War Hayemaker.

    Comment

    • NakiFan
      Banned
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 6971
      • 435
      • 268
      • 9,796

      #12
      By the way that was not an attack on calzaghe, im just being realistic.

      Comment

      • Johnny Rebel
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Oct 2004
        • 1651
        • 79
        • 190
        • 7,877

        #13
        Originally posted by Infern0
        You know Joe Calzaghe? well he beat A good version of Hopkins, Eubank, Bika, Kessler and Lacy and capped it off by schooling a faded roy jones. He never lost a fight, even on a technicality, was ring champ, and a world champ at two weight classes, he was also world champion for over a decade.

        Joe Calzaghe is NOT a top atg, he is an atg, but barely.

        P4P the Klitshko brothers are no where near Calzaghe, but far far behind him in terms of achievements.

        What is the klitschko equivilent to a win over Bernard Hopkins or Mikkel Kessler? Danny Williams?, Julius Francis?

        Klitschkos and ATG should never be used in the same sentence.
        Are Larry Holmes and Joe Louis All-Time greats? IMO they are, but both have really weak names on their resumes mainly because of the lack of quality prime fighters during their reigns. Wlad's resume matches up with Holmes, especially if he holds his belts and has several more successful defenses.

        Comment

        • NakiFan
          Banned
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Jan 2009
          • 6971
          • 435
          • 268
          • 9,796

          #14
          Both those fighters fought in better eras than the current "worst division of all time"

          They were also more impressive against the bums they fought, and didnt only win due to unfair size advantages.

          Comment

          • Derranged
            Banned
            Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
            • Oct 2005
            • 46593
            • 2,126
            • 1,350
            • 162,628

            #15
            Im a fan, I dont think Haye is a bum.

            But the same people who are calling him a bum, are the same people who will tell you that Haye was a really good win for Wladimir if Wladimir beats him. Dont listen those people..

            Comment

            • Spray_resistant
              Vacant interim regular(C)
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2009
              • 29609
              • 2,972
              • 1,565
              • 53,384

              #16
              Originally posted by Infern0
              If Haye was all the things you say then he would not have got this fight, and it would not be such a huge event. Face it boys, Haye Vs Wlad is the only fight that people wan't to see and it's not because of Wlad.
              Well to be fair it is at least 50% because of Wlad or am I wrong and would people fill up an arena to see Haye stand in the ring by himself?

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP