Do you think Hopkins is the Best of this decade????

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dde91
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 2686
    • 86
    • 20
    • 9,217

    #1

    Do you think Hopkins is the Best of this decade????

    Since B-Hop might retire for good now, how do you rate him in this decade. And after, how do you rate him ALL TIME against other greats like Hagler, Monzon, Hearns, Leonard, ETC.


    To me, i feel that he is the best boxer of this past decade. Was P4P for a long time, and dominated MW divsion and had the LHW crown for a couple of years. Beat the youngsters, and was in close fights were many feels that he should have won, TAYLOR x2, calzaghe. To me it was clear he should have won Taylor 1.

    So how do you rate this legendary fighter. He worked all the way to the top from nothing. Kept his body in great condition, and fought whoever challenged.
    95
    Yes he is!!!
    27.37%
    26
    NO, not close!
    29.47%
    28
    Not the best, but top 3
    43.16%
    41
  • MoneyMayFan
    Undisputed Champion
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 1917
    • 66
    • 8
    • 13,196

    #2
    I agree that he should have won that first taylor fight..But **** it...Winky whoops his ass at a lower weight

    Comment

    • dde91
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Oct 2008
      • 2686
      • 86
      • 20
      • 9,217

      #3
      Originally posted by MoneyMayFan
      I agree that he should have won that first taylor fight..But **** it...Winky whoops his ass at a lower weight
      at 160, Hopkins would grind it out against Winky in my opinion prime for prime. Winky is great himself, but at 160, Hopkins is dominate. just like at 154 Winky is dominate.

      Comment

      • boxasmash
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 7039
        • 222
        • 63
        • 14,591

        #4
        he has the best resume of any welterweight... oh wait.

        Comment

        • dde91
          Undisputed Champion
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2008
          • 2686
          • 86
          • 20
          • 9,217

          #5
          Originally posted by boxasmash
          he has the best resume of any welterweight... oh wait.
          and Calzaghe has the best resume for BUMS

          Comment

          • gingeralbino
            WAR MAGEE!!!
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 7999
            • 224
            • 388
            • 20,405

            #6
            Originally posted by dde91
            Since B-Hop might retire for good now, how do you rate him in this decade. And after, how do you rate him ALL TIME against other greats like Hagler, Monzon, Hearns, Leonard, ETC.


            To me, i feel that he is the best boxer of this past decade. Was P4P for a long time, and dominated MW divsion and had the LHW crown for a couple of years. Beat the youngsters, and was in close fights were many feels that he should have won, TAYLOR x2, calzaghe. To me it was clear he should have won Taylor 1.

            So how do you rate this legendary fighter. He worked all the way to the top from nothing. Kept his body in great condition, and fought whoever challenged.
            Floyd and Pac are above him IMO.
            I'd put Calzaghe above him too, but I always liked Calzaghe, and never liked Hopkins so that may be me biased.
            4th, so no option for me to vote!

            Comment

            • Sick/
              Banned
              • Feb 2009
              • 11284
              • 554
              • 866
              • 14,892

              #7
              Joe Calzaghe.

              Comment

              • dde91
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Oct 2008
                • 2686
                • 86
                • 20
                • 9,217

                #8
                Originally posted by gingeralbino
                Floyd and Pac are above him IMO.
                I'd put Calzaghe above him too, but I always liked Calzaghe, and never liked Hopkins so that may be me biased.
                4th, so no option for me to vote!
                Wow, Calzaghe over Hopkins??????????????

                you must be new to boxing.

                Comment

                • Chr0nic
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 4501
                  • 191
                  • 213
                  • 5,494

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dde91
                  Wow, Calzaghe over Hopkins??????????????

                  you must be new to boxing.
                  what you expect it's a calzaghe fan, they dont watch or support boxing

                  Comment

                  • gingeralbino
                    WAR MAGEE!!!
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 7999
                    • 224
                    • 388
                    • 20,405

                    #10
                    Originally posted by dde91
                    Wow, Calzaghe over Hopkins??????????????

                    you must be new to boxing.
                    like i said i may be biased. Buts its a question about opinion and thats mine.
                    Theres a good arguement for it, just like theres a good arguement for Hopkins, and most people would agree that they are pretty damn close.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP