Bradley vs Holt - How did you score it?

[rj_ct]

didn't score it. i'll just say it was frustrating to watch as a fan of kendall holt, and i felt he lost the fight.

[Spacey1991]

HOLT-BRADLEY
01. 10-8
02. 10-9
03. 9-10
04. 10-9
05. 9-10
06. 9-10
07. 9-10
08. 9-10
09. 10-9
10. 9-10
11. 9-10
12. 9-9 (Holt got the KD socred, Bradley won virtually every other second, and the KD wasn't huge.)


112-114, for Bradley. JIM!

Aha, nice one!

[STEELHEAD]

Yeah was a good punch, people are trying to say Bradley's chin is suspect... it isn't at all, he was just caught on the button with a really good punch.



Nope, sorry I disagree with you... in Mayweather vs De La Hoya if I recall rightly Mayweather was throwing less and landing more... so he had a higher percentage and higher punch connection. In this fight, Holt threw less and landed less as I recall... so he wasn't scoring any rounds.

That's my opinion anyway...

thats how i see it.
but dang if holt would of thrown more punches outcome may have been different.
when i score a round i divide round in half. and then if one fighter only wins one of the halfs then i think who was more busier or who controlled the pace. easier on a burnt brain to tabulate for me.
also scoring in halfs like this cuts down on the bad scoring of a laying back fighter stealing the round with action just in last 30seconds.

[delipooke]

I had it 114-112 for Bradley, identical with Calderon's.

[Spacey1991]

thats how i see it.
but dang if holt would of thrown more punches outcome may have been different.
when i score a round i divide round in half. and then if one fighter only wins one of the halfs then i think who was more busier or who controlled the pace. easier on a burnt brain to tabulate for me.

Agreed, Holt could have taken this...