Bradley vs Holt - How did you score it?

[Spacey1991]

Basically, I have heard SOME people moaning... claiming Holt was robbed, I disagree... but thought I would make a thread asking how you scored it and what you thought the outcome was in YOUR opinion.

I had it 114-112 Bradley, Holt got a good knock down at the start but faded away and did nothing... he only started stealing more rounds towards the end of the fight in my opinion.

How did you have it?

[Kevin Malone]

113-113. No robbery was involved.

[STEELHEAD]

bradley 114-113 . would not argue if it was called a draw.
boy but did bradley get clocked and dropped in the first!
made the 3rd round a 10-10.
there were 2 very close rounds that i gave to bradley for activity but holt deffinatly landing the harder.

[Horus]

Some people score the clean and harder punches.
Some people score workrate.

I score clean and harder punches.

This fight reminds me of the floyd and oscar fight in this reguard.

Oscar was more busier and had a higher workrate
But Floyd landed the harder and cleaner punches.

and in that fight 1 judge gave the fight to oscar.
and 2 other judges gave it to mayweather.

it just goes to show you, that Some judges score workrate and Some judges score clean and harder punches.

and in this fight the rounds i give to Holt. I gave it to him because he landed the cleaner & Harder punches.

because bradley just like calzaghe will always have a higher workrate, but workrate doesnt mean **** if your punches are not doing any damage.

My Scorecard.

10-8 Holt
9-10 Bradley
9-10 Bradley
9-10 Bradley
10-9 Holt
9-10 Bradley
9-10 Bradley
10-9 Holt
10-9 Holt
9-10 Bradley (CLOSE ROUND...it could have went both way)
9-10 Bradley
10-8 Holt

Either it is Draw
Holt 5 rounds 113
Bradley 7 rounds 113



Or
Holt wins
Holt 6 rounds 114
Bradley 7 rounds 112

[Spacey1991]

bradley 114-113 . would not argue if it was called a draw.
boy but did bradley get clocked and dropped in the first!
made the 3rd round a 10-10.
there were 2 very close rounds that i gave to bradley for activity but holt deffinatly landing the harder.

Yeah was a good punch, people are trying to say Bradley's chin is suspect... it isn't at all, he was just caught on the button with a really good punch.

Some people score the clean and harder punches.
Some people score workrate.

I score clean and harder punches.

This fight reminds me of the floyd and oscar fight in this reguard.

Oscar was more busier and had a higher workrate
But Floyd landed the harder and cleaner punches.

and in that fight 1 judge gave the fight to oscar.
and 2 other judges gave it to mayweather.

it just goes to show you, that Some judges score workrate and Some judges score clean and harder punches.

and in this fight the rounds i give to Holt. I gave it to him because he landed the cleaner & Harder punches.

because bradley just like calzaghe will always have a higher workrate, but workrate doesnt mean **** if your punches are not doing any damage.

My Scorecard.

10-8 Holt
9-10 Bradley
9-10 Bradley
9-10 Bradley
10-9 Holt
9-10 Bradley
9-10 Bradley
10-9 Holt
10-9 Holt
9-10 Bradley (CLOSE ROUND...it could have went both way)
9-10 Bradley
10-8 Holt

Either it is Draw
Holt 5 rounds 113
Bradley 7 rounds 113



Or
Holt wins
Holt 6 rounds 114
Bradley 7 rounds 112

Nope, sorry I disagree with you... in Mayweather vs De La Hoya if I recall rightly Mayweather was throwing less and landing more... so he had a higher percentage and higher punch connection. In this fight, Holt threw less and landed less as I recall... so he wasn't scoring any rounds.

That's my opinion anyway...

[miamijohn]

Basically, I have heard SOME people moaning... claiming Holt was robbed, I disagree... but thought I would make a thread asking how you scored it and what you thought the outcome was in YOUR opinion.

I had it 114-112 Bradley, Holt got a good knock down at the start but faded away and did nothing... he only started stealing more rounds towards the end of the fight in my opinion.

How did you have it?

115-111 for bradly.

[Too Short]

I had it eight rounds to four Bradley 144-112 and maybe it could have been more like nine rounds to three.

Bradley dominated the range, great to the body and was to quick with foot speed and countering. Too bad Tim's not a power puncher because he's one of the most impressive young fighters around.

[Spacey1991]

I had it eight rounds to four Bradley 144-112 and maybe it could have been more like nine rounds to three.

Bradley dominated the range, great to the body and was to quick with foot speed and countering. Too bad Tim's not a power puncher because he's one of the most impressive young fighters around.

Yeah great boxer, besides power... he has all the tools to make it big, he just needs to get some wins and experience under his belt.

[MACAQUEINBLACK]

This fight reminds me of the floyd and oscar fight in this reguard.

Oscar was more busier and had a higher workrate
But Floyd landed the harder and cleaner punches.

Well, a lot of fights follow that vague outline. There are nuances, though.

Here's one. Oscar's attempts to work Floyd's body were wholly ineffective. Bradley actually landed punishing body shots. Did you score those and note the effect they had on Holt?



I wasn't scoring. But I felt intuitively that Bradley took the fight, even with the 2nd late KD. He was a bit wild and eager to please at the start, but he corrected it quick and you could see from early on that Bradley's investment to the body would tell in the fight.

[THe TRiNiTY]

HOLT-BRADLEY
01. 10-8
02. 10-9
03. 9-10
04. 10-9
05. 9-10
06. 9-10
07. 9-10
08. 9-10
09. 10-9
10. 9-10
11. 9-10
12. 9-9 (Holt got the KD socred, Bradley won virtually every other second, and the KD wasn't huge.)


112-114, for Bradley. JIM!