Do you think a boxer's won-loss record is a number which is most decieving in boxing?
Collapse
-
Comment
-
Opinions are like arseholes! Everyone has got one.
Don't want this swaying into a Calzaghe hate thread(which it probably will anyway!) But the point i was making in the first place when i bought Calzaghe up was that, he has only fought ONE elite P4P fighter his whole career. (Hopkins).
That's all.Comment
-
Was Hopkins still elite though when Calzaghe beat him ? not for me.Opinions are like arseholes! Everyone has got one.
Don't want this swaying into a Calzaghe hate thread(which it probably will anyway!) But the point i was making in the first place when i bought Calzaghe up was that, he has only fought ONE elite P4P fighter his whole career. (Hopkins).
That's all.
He is still a good fighter, but he has not been elite for a while imo.
Joe has never beaten an elite fighter imo.Comment
-
-
It's a double edge sword as far as Hopkins is concerned. He was P4P, but i suppose you're right in that he wasn't as good as he once was at 160, but he's good when he fought Calzaghe still if ya know what i mean? And he gave Calzaghe the toughest fight of his career IMO.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Records can be very deceiving.
Perfect examples:
Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. - undefeated but is being held back because he is not yet ready to fight the bigger names.
Edwin Valero - also undefeated but we haven't seen him fight tougher opposition. He gets a chance to prove himself this month.
Humberto Soto - has 7 losses but he's a good fighter.
Cristian Mijares - has 5 losses but a very good technical boxer. He's been swaying from that effective style lately. Hopefully, he gets his act together.Comment

Comment