Who [active] UNDER THE AGE OF 32 has MORE acclompishments than Floyd Mayweather??

[Horus]

I wasnt trying to call you out i was legitimately curious as to where you got the quotes

It's coo. i was just telling where i got the quotes from..

[Burner]

You could then say that Hernandez was old and Corrales was weight drained. Mayweather arguably has one loss to Castillo.

Naw Im going to say Genaro was 38-1.

And Im goign to say Diego was 33-0...with like 27 KO's or some sick shyt like that.

You sir.

Fail.

[baracuda]

Maybe they were not in the same weight division

Geez you are a dumb ****

but they can easily be in the same weight division,can't they?you still feel smart?

[1000 Left Fist]

pacquiao thread closed.

[F l i c k e r]

pacquiao thread closed.

dude. I like pacquiao too but got damn. You must be Pinoy or something.

[BennyST]

The Ring Belt is THE real belt. Come on, man. None of those bodies (WBC,WBA,IBF) are as unbias and serious about their rankings or belts.
Sure, its cool when a guy can hold 5 belts and all, but thats not what makes you the Champion.

I agree completely that it's the belt. It is nonetheless, quite different from undisputed champion. Winning one title can make you the Ring champ. It cannot in any way make you the undisputed champ. Even with the Ring title, there can still be a little bit of argument about who is the best. Undisputed means exactly that. Hopkins was the last undisputed champ at MW in my opinion. I don't think there have been many undisputed champions in boxing in the last ten years.

Horus: No offense mate. You actually don't know anything about boxing. You know about Mayweather. That's it. I can guarantee you've never stepped in the ring and apart from him, you haven't got a clue about the actual history of the sport. Go home.

[Burner]

I agree completely that it's the belt. It is nonetheless, quite different from undisputed champion. Winning one title can make you the Ring champ. It cannot in any way make you the undisputed champ. Even with the Ring title, there can still be a little bit of argument about who is the best. Undisputed means exactly that. Hopkins was the last undisputed champ at MW in my opinion. I don't think there have been many undisputed champions in boxing in the last ten years.

Horus: No offense mate. You actually don't know anything about boxing. You know about Mayweather. That's it. I can guarantee you've never stepped in the ring and apart from him, you haven't got a clue about the actual history of the sport. Go home.

Isnt this thread about...



















wait for it..........




















Mayweather???????

[Danny Gunz]

The fact that there are two fighters in boxing with these many accomplishments at the same time should be enough for this fight to be a done deal.

In ten years when both of them are out of the game and they havent fought people arent gonna say "well floyd's heart wasnt in the game." or "pacquiao deserved more money to fight thats why the fight never went through" they are gonna be saying "how the **** does this fight not happen"

And besides having more accomplishments then Pac doesnt really mean floyd was a better fighter it could just mean he had more opportunities

but what do i know im just a hater

[BennyST]

Naw Im going to say Genaro was 38-1.

And Im goign to say Diego was 33-0...with like 27 KO's or some sick shyt like that.

You sir.

Fail.

Take it easy Burner. You see where I'm coming from though? I don't care who is seen as better. I would argue against Pac as vehemently as I would argue anything about Mayweather. I like both guys.

The bias in this thread is absurd though. Just want to point some of it out. See, saying that Pac beat a weight drained Morales (which I think he did, apart from just being done), lost to Marquez twice (which I absolutely think he did) etc etc, is the same as saying Mayweather beat a weight drained Corrales who was mentally not there, beat an old Oscar (much like Pac, though he beat an even older version), beat an old Hernandez, who retired straight after this fight, and who had been absolutely broken down years earlier anyway. You dig?

Relax guys. I'm not against Mayweather. I'm not on some psycho hunt to ridicule him. Nor am I on a 'put Pac on a pedestal'.

Far out, this can get scary man. All I want to see is a decent debate that actually has some consistencies.

[baracuda]

The only thing that was OWNED was Cotto's pride and muscularity when he fought Margarito

anybody would've got beaten by a guy who had cement inside his gloves!