Is Hatton eligible to ever be #1 P4P?

[Esquire Dale]

Pound for pound just means that out of all the divisions you are overall the best fighter, so i don't think it matters THAT MUCH if you only fight in one division, otherwise how come Mike Tyson was p4p number 1, i know its different but still.

^ This


So yes, he is. If Hatton beats Pacman he is the P4P king.

[Me La Pelan]

B-HOP was P4P top 3 for a while and most of his career was in the same division. Again you guys, you know who, manage to misinterpret boxing lingo to your advantage. AND WHY THE *** DO MF'ers say for example
"he did not avenge the lost he had against....." Some **** is just irritating to see.

P4P rankings DON"T mean who has won more belts in the most divisions!!!
It does help, but that is NOT what P4P means.

[Jean28]

Best P4P could be changed to "best overall?" and it would mean the same thing.

[MANGLER]

B-HOP was P4P top 3 for a while and most of his career was in the same division. Again you guys, you know who, manage to misinterpret boxing lingo to your advantage. AND WHY THE *** DO MF'ers say for example
"he did not avenge the lost he had against....." Some **** is just irritating to see.

P4P rankings DON"T mean who has won more belts in the most divisions!!!
It does help, but that is NOT what P4P means.

Very good post homey. +K

[Owlzfan84]

B-HOP was P4P top 3 for a while and most of his career was in the same division. Again you guys, you know who, manage to misinterpret boxing lingo to your advantage. AND WHY THE *** DO MF'ers say for example
"he did not avenge the lost he had against....." Some **** is just irritating to see.

P4P rankings DON"T mean who has won more belts in the most divisions!!!
It does help, but that is NOT what P4P means.

Excellent post. Another guy who was considered one of the top p4p guys was Hagler, and he only was in one weight class his whole career. Aaron Pryor was another one as well.

[PrettyBoyRoy 88]

B-HOP was P4P top 3 for a while and most of his career was in the same division. Again you guys, you know who, manage to misinterpret boxing lingo to your advantage. AND WHY THE *** DO MF'ers say for example
"he did not avenge the lost he had against....." Some **** is just irritating to see.

P4P rankings DON"T mean who has won more belts in the most divisions!!!
It does help, but that is NOT what P4P means.

It relieves me to see a post like this.

[DiegoFuego]

He sucks too much imo but if he beat Pacquiao and Mayweather then yeah give him that ****

[ELPacman]

I think you guys are forgetting or didn't read everything. I mentioned how Hatton ALREADY attempted another weight class and failed pretty bad at it. Thus he's moved back down to the only division he seemed to be good at. So now with that in mind that he sucks ballz at another weight class, would you guys say he can still be P4P top 3? A fighter whose jumping up and down classes is going to meet him at the weight class he's best at which should advantage him. I don't see how Hatton can move up any higher in ranking than he is, whereever that might be.

[$partacus]

I think you guys are forgetting or didn't read everything. I mentioned how Hatton ALREADY attempted another weight class and failed pretty bad at it. Thus he's moved back down to the only division he seemed to be good at. So now with that in mind that he sucks ballz at another weight class, would you guys say he can still be P4P top 3? A fighter whose jumping up and down classes is going to meet him at the weight class he's best at which should advantage him. I don't see how Hatton can move up any higher than he is whereever that might be.

P4P isn't about moving up and down weight classes.

[NakiFan]

^^^^^^^^^^^

How well would Tyson do at cruiserweight?