Official Poll: Should Cotto give Margarito a rematch (Paycheck) or move on?

**MANGLER** · 03-28-2009, 01:43 PM

Marg don't deserve it, but personally I still wanna see it.

**carloson75** · 03-28-2009, 01:45 PM

proves he was using it. If he didn't needed vs Cotto, who beat Shane Mosley he wouldn't have used it vs Mosley.

**THRILLA77** · 03-28-2009, 01:46 PM

hell yea its more interesting now

**El Dominicano** · 03-28-2009, 01:46 PM

Originally posted by mangler

Marg don't deserve it, but personally I still wanna see it.

I know what you mean because it isn't proven that Margarito did either. So for all we know, Margarito MIGHT...might be the better fight (Although, I dont think so)

**savorduhflavor** · 03-28-2009, 01:46 PM

Of course not.

Margarito should be banned from the sport. Cotto fighting him would be going against that.

You guys put too much stock into this "avenge your loss" notion, as if it means something in this situation. Margarito got caught trying to cheat. Cotto thinks he did it in their fight and thinks he should be banned....the same opinion as 95% of the boxing public. And than people say they lose respect for Cotto for not wanting the rematch? You have seriously got to be kidding me.

Cotto shouldn't want to do business with a man like that. He has nothing to prove. To do that gives him a pay day he doesn't deserve, and gives him exposure he doesn't deserve. Margarito doesn't deserve the spotlight, and that's more important TO THE SPORT OF BOXING than Cotto avenging a loss that is in question.

End of story.

**MANGLER** · 03-28-2009, 01:51 PM

Originally posted by El Dominicano

I know what you mean because it isn't proven that Margarito did either. So for all we know, Margarito MIGHT...might be the better fight (Although, I dont think so)

Cats round here are actin like the revelation about the plaster before the SSM fight has anything to do wit the Cotto fight. I don't blame anybody for bein su****ious but there's still no proof. I'm just sick of everybody whinin about it.

**el malo** · 03-28-2009, 01:52 PM

Originally posted by savorduhflavor

Of course not.

Margarito should be banned from the sport. Cotto fighting him would be going against that.

You guys put too much stock into this "avenge your loss" notion, as if it means something in this situation. Margarito got caught trying to cheat. Cotto thinks he did it in their fight and thinks he should be banned....the same opinion as 95% of the boxing public. And than people say they lose respect for Cotto for not wanting the rematch? You have seriously got to be kidding me.

Cotto shouldn't want to do business with a man like that. He has nothing to prove. To do that gives him a pay day he doesn't deserve, and gives him exposure he doesn't deserve. Margarito doesn't deserve the spotlight, and that's more important TO THE SPORT OF BOXING than Cotto avenging a loss that is in question.

End of story.

cosign this. cotto got bigger and better things ahead of him, he's fighting clottey in june, then the rematch with mosley. marg doesn't deserve to get another payday again from anybody. end of thread

**BMWM3P** · 03-28-2009, 01:53 PM

As much as I want to see this, Cotto should move on and tell Plasterito to go **** himself. But if Plasterito is willing to do it for free in Caguas, then by all means kick his ass and leave the rest for us.

**BattlingNelson** · 03-28-2009, 01:54 PM

It's up to Cotto if he wants to fight a convict in the slammer. It's seen before though with James Scott.

Official Poll: Should Cotto give Margarito a rematch (Paycheck) or move on?