If cotto had better defense!

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fallenloki
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Jan 2008
    • 1345
    • 77
    • 132
    • 1,681

    #11
    There is no proof that there was plaster in his gloves. The athletic commission already came out and said that they're almost absolutely sure there was no foul-play. I mean, honestly, there are GROUPS of people watching the hands get wrapped. I don't know why you people keep using that as an excuse for Cotto quitting after having his heart taken away.

    Comment

    • salinass1234
      Contender
      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
      • Mar 2006
      • 398
      • 19
      • 0
      • 6,498

      #12
      Originally posted by IwatchBoxing
      1. Cotto was pound for pound before Margarito

      2. Margarito is Mexican. And his victory was quickly **** rided by his supporters.

      3. Complain away because everything is revelent.

      Now Cotto fans have a chance at complaning, after all that **** riding, yet it is annoying, I'm not annoyed one bit, I was annoyed at all the Margarito **** riding, but no one esle was.


      Your boy got his ass handed to him loaded gloves or not!! It was a beautiful sight seeing him all jacked up!

      Comment

      • ..WaRSpencE..
        .::Orgullo Mexicano::.
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 6316
        • 310
        • 132
        • 13,727

        #13
        To Mangler and Savor..

        I agree to an extent..but you both are more annoying going in every single plaster thread talking about "Let it go. he's banned. this **** is old. etc."...

        A mans (Mosley) life was in danger and it could have possibly been Cotto as well...and god knows who else!..

        This **** had nothing to do with Cotto's defense..boxers fight..and get hit in return..believe it or not..but to those who keep sayin this **** is old and repetitive..well so is most of boxing opinions..like I'm tired of people saying SRR is the greatest of all time!..how do you guys know?...i'll say a good 80% of people here who say that **** are basing their opinion off of other people they "respect"..

        Now while this **** has been played to death...it's a very important topic in the boxing world IMO..It's not like.."Oh he tried to whoop on Mosley with Casts?..O'well"..do you understand people have gotten permanantly injured because of plaster of paris when it could have been avoided??...that ain't simple **** to just brush off and call old because people seem to show interest in the disgusting acts of a fighter/trainer..

        Don't mind me tho..just stating my opinion

        Comment

        • salinass1234
          Contender
          Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 398
          • 19
          • 0
          • 6,498

          #14
          Originally posted by .::WaRCoTTo::.
          To Mangler and Savor..

          I agree to an extent..but you both are more annoying going in every single plaster thread talking about "Let it go. he's banned. this **** is old. etc."...

          A mans (Mosley) life was in danger and it could have possibly been Cotto as well...and god knows who else!..

          This **** had nothing to do with Cotto's defense..boxers fight..and get hit in return..believe it or not..but to those who keep sayin this **** is old and repetitive..well so is most of boxing opinions..like I'm tired of people saying SRR is the greatest of all time!..how do you guys know?...i'll say a good 80% of people here who say that **** are basing their opinion off of other people they "respect"..

          Now while this **** has been played to death...it's a very important topic in the boxing world IMO..It's not like.."Oh he tried to whoop on Mosley with Casts?..O'well"..do you understand people have gotten permanantly injured because of plaster of paris when it could have been avoided??...that ain't simple **** to just brush off and call old because people seem to show interest in the disgusting acts of a fighter/trainer..

          Don't mind me tho..just stating my opinion
          I agree with you completely! No one should be allowed to cheat! but no one has proven that he cheated in the cotto fight! Cotto is just trying to salvage a loss. How would it sound if DLH said he wanted the loss overturned to SSM for steriods??

          Comment

          • savorduhflavor
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 8194
            • 288
            • 59
            • 14,875

            #15
            Originally posted by .::WaRCoTTo::.
            To Mangler and Savor..

            I agree to an extent..but you both are more annoying going in every single plaster thread talking about "Let it go. he's banned. this **** is old. etc."...

            A mans (Mosley) life was in danger and it could have possibly been Cotto as well...and god knows who else!..

            This **** had nothing to do with Cotto's defense..boxers fight..and get hit in return..believe it or not..but to those who keep sayin this **** is old and repetitive..well so is most of boxing opinions..like I'm tired of people saying SRR is the greatest of all time!..how do you guys know?...i'll say a good 80% of people here who say that **** are basing their opinion off of other people they "respect"..

            Now while this **** has been played to death...it's a very important topic in the boxing world IMO..It's not like.."Oh he tried to whoop on Mosley with Casts?..O'well"..do you understand people have gotten permanantly injured because of plaster of paris when it could have been avoided??...that ain't simple **** to just brush off and call old because people seem to show interest in the disgusting acts of a fighter/trainer..

            Don't mind me tho..just stating my opinion
            I agree that it's important, but it'd be one thing if people were talking sense. If these threads were filled with knowledgeable posts with people actually making good points.

            Most of them just turn into petty ass fights and nothing gets resolved so it's like what's the point? You get a Margarito fan being like "oh it's not proven that it happened in the Cotto fight" and than a Cotto fan freaking out over him for it. And it happens in EVERY thread, you don't find that annoying?

            If people don't get into petty arguments that clutter every thread I wouldn't care. But that's been proven pretty much impossible on NSB.

            Comment

            • Ryn0
              Undisputed Champion
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 11139
              • 310
              • 269
              • 20,767

              #16
              Originally posted by salinass1234
              Bro he is innocent until proven other wise! Just let it be
              When the ingredients that make plaster of Paris are found in your gloves and you're banned for a year every you do is in question.

              Having Plaster ****ing against a earmuff defense for 10 rounds is going to screw someone up.

              Comment

              • salinass1234
                Contender
                Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                • Mar 2006
                • 398
                • 19
                • 0
                • 6,498

                #17
                Originally posted by Ryn0
                When the ingredients that make plaster of Paris are found in your gloves and you're banned for a year every you do is in question.

                Having Plaster ****ing against a earmuff defense for 10 rounds is going to screw someone up.


                Dude was that same substance found in the cotto fight??

                Comment

                • Ray  Ray
                  HOLDIN IT DOWN`
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2007
                  • 7791
                  • 451
                  • 852
                  • 20,693

                  #18
                  Originally posted by salinass1234
                  Dude was that same substance found in the cotto fight??
                  Are you seriously trying to defend that punk ***** Margorito?

                  Comment

                  • salinass1234
                    Contender
                    Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                    • Mar 2006
                    • 398
                    • 19
                    • 0
                    • 6,498

                    #19
                    Originally posted by Ray Ray
                    Are you seriously trying to defend that punk ***** Margorito?
                    I'am just trying to make sense of the cott fight accusations!

                    Comment

                    • fallenloki
                      Banned
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Jan 2008
                      • 1345
                      • 77
                      • 132
                      • 1,681

                      #20
                      Absolutely right, Salinass1234
                      Last edited by fallenloki; 03-28-2009, 11:48 AM. Reason: wrong

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP