Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Zab Judah's Offer Was Embarrasing, Says Matthew Hatton

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by Dave Rado View Post
    If know you're going to be beaten, I don't see why it's dumbass to insist on getting good money for it - after losing to Judah he'd go back to obscurity again.

    I get your point homey, but did he seriously think he was in a position to renegotiate terms wit Zab? Dude's fallen hard but is still way more of a name than Matthew, who's just 'the other Hatton.' Matthew needed to realize who was doin who a favor and just take whatever was given to him. It surely woulda been higher than anything else he's gotten.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by mangler View Post
      I get your point homey, but did he seriously think he was in a position to renegotiate terms wit Zab? Dude's fallen hard but is still way more of a name than Matthew, who's just 'the other Hatton.' Matthew needed to realize who was doin who a favor and just take whatever was given to him. It surely woulda been higher than anything else he's gotten.
      Well he claims he was offered less to fight Judah than he normally makes fighting journeymen - which is why he said it was an embarrassing offer. If he's telling the truth, then I don't blame him for turning it down, for a fight he would lose.

      His actual words were:
      "It's a fight I would fancy, but I am not taking a pay cut to fight someone at his level,"
      Last edited by Dave Rado; 03-28-2009, 12:59 AM.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Dave Rado View Post
        Well he claims he was offered less to fight Judah than he normally makes fighting journeymen - which is why he said it was an embarrassing offer. If he's telling the truth, then I don't blame him for turning it down, for a fight he would lose.

        His actual words were:
        "It's a fight I would fancy, but I am not taking a pay cut to fight someone at his level,"

        I don't buy that ****. If it were true I'd fully agree also. But how much could he possibly be makin against the guys he's faced thus far? I suspect he's bein greedy thinkin his last name had some stroke or he just didn't want it.

        Comment


        • #44
          zab should really be pushing for that paulie fight right now!!!!!!1

          Comment


          • #45
            A lot of ppl are saying he would lose, but Mathew Hatton is actually a pretty good boxer, and has a really good chance of beating the modern day Zab judah. He's already a naturally bigger guy then Zab, he's a pretty slick boxer, and as we all know Zab isnt nearly what he used to be.

            It was a very winnable fight, but Hatton blew it.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Owlzfan84 View Post
              A lot of ppl are saying he would lose, but Mathew Hatton is actually a pretty good boxer, and has a really good chance of beating the modern day Zab judah. He's already a naturally bigger guy then Zab, he's a pretty slick boxer, and as we all know Zab isnt nearly what he used to be.

              It was a very winnable fight, but Hatton blew it.
              Two fights ago he lost to Craig Watson, who is a journeyman. His best win was his last fight against a very faded Tackie, who has lost five fights in a row ... I'm not at all convinced.

              Judah isn't what he once was but he can still hang with the best even though he can't beat them any more. He gave Clottey a good fight.
              Last edited by Dave Rado; 03-28-2009, 01:30 AM.

              Comment


              • #47
                lol Judah is a huge joke now i would hardly give Matthew Hatton any credit if he were to win!!!

                Comment


                • #48
                  Hatton wont beat Bami so its all of little consequence.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Wait, when did Matt reach "contender" status?

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      oh man big mistake on little hatton's part

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP