In THIS era, can you be P4P #1 without great speed?

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • QUISQUEYA
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Apr 2008
    • 2800
    • 107
    • 79
    • 3,086

    #1

    In THIS era, can you be P4P #1 without great speed?

    I was thinking about the P4P lineage recently.

    It goes (roughly) like this;

    Tyson => Chavez* => Pernell => Jones => Oscar => Shane => Hopkins => Mayweather => Pacquiao => Marquez**

    Tito might have held it for a minute. Maybe somebody else.

    But my observation is that each one of those guys happened to be the (or among the) fastest guy in his own weight class. Has something substantially changed about the boxing game where the slugger is becoming obsolete, or is at a clear disadvantage?

    * obvious exception
    ** write it down, bitches
  • MANGLER
    Sex Tape Flop Artist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 30142
    • 1,705
    • 2,355
    • 46,598

    #2
    P4P just means if everybody had their same skill set and was the same size, the #1 guy would likely beat everyone. As long as you're the most dominant guy out there, I guess it don't matter how you win, just as long as you win. Could be w/ speed, power, workrate, whatever.

    Comment

    • THE REED
      Sixty Forty
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Apr 2007
      • 43481
      • 1,988
      • 1,483
      • 690,068,075

      #3
      Marquez is #2 in the world, and he isn't the fastest fighter out there...

      Comment

      • AztecWanker
        Banned
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 5331
        • 401
        • 505
        • 6,208

        #4
        I think Hagler had it for a while. I don't think he was THAT fast but was great everywhere else.

        Comment

        • deliveryman
          Your token white guy
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Mar 2006
          • 7592
          • 362
          • 178
          • 15,510

          #5
          Originally posted by QUISQUEYA
          I was thinking about the P4P lineage recently.

          It goes (roughly) like this;

          Tyson => Chavez* => Pernell => Jones => Oscar => Shane => Hopkins => Mayweather => Pacquiao => Marquez**

          Tito might have held it for a minute. Maybe somebody else.

          But my observation is that each one of those guys happened to be the (or among the) fastest guy in his own weight class. Has something substantially changed about the boxing game where the slugger is becoming obsolete, or is at a clear disadvantage?

          * obvious exception
          ** write it down, bitches
          Although not exactly slow, I don't think Hopkins nor Oscar had "great" hand speed.

          Comment

          • Chups
            Banned
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • May 2004
            • 18402
            • 1,835
            • 1,281
            • 52,879

            #6
            Originally posted by mangler
            P4P just means if everybody had their same skill set and was the same size, the #1 guy would likely beat everyone. As long as you're the most dominant guy out there, I guess it don't matter how you win, just as long as you win. Could be w/ speed, power, workrate, whatever.
            That and many others.....including quality of opposition.

            Comment

            • T-97
              BuyTheTicketTakeTheRide
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Nov 2007
              • 14808
              • 566
              • 628
              • 22,958

              #7
              Originally posted by deliveryman
              Although not exactly slow, I don't think Hopkins nor Oscar had "great" hand speed.
              I disagree on Oscar, in his prime he had very fast hands IMO. Hopkins is pretty fast, but I wouldn't say he was exceptionally fast...

              Comment

              • QUISQUEYA
                Banned
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Apr 2008
                • 2800
                • 107
                • 79
                • 3,086

                #8
                Originally posted by reedickyaluss
                Marquez is #2 in the world, and he isn't the fastest fighter out there...
                But he kept losing to a faster guy...right? That is the reason he isn't #1.

                Please refer to thread title.

                Comment

                • QUISQUEYA
                  Banned
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Apr 2008
                  • 2800
                  • 107
                  • 79
                  • 3,086

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Gift Of Gab
                  I think Hagler had it for a while. I don't think he was THAT fast but was great everywhere else.
                  in THIS era. Hagler retired over 20 years ago. And I don't even think he had it. Gotta go check.

                  Comment

                  • Spacey1991
                    Undisputed Champion
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Jan 2009
                    • 8885
                    • 247
                    • 282
                    • 18,684

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mangler
                    P4P just means if everybody had their same skill set and was the same size, the #1 guy would likely beat everyone. As long as you're the most dominant guy out there, I guess it don't matter how you win, just as long as you win. Could be w/ speed, power, workrate, whatever.
                    Summed it up.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP