Why are the Klitscho's never mandatory for each others belts?

**gingeralbino** · 03-24-2009, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by da_beast

Surley the same rules apply to them as everyone else. You have to fight the mandatory? They must be mandatorys for each others titles at some point or shall be soon.

I know that they would never fight but ffs. Is it just me or do i see a problem here?

Can someone please enlighten me here?

If u hold one alphabet title then u are never a mandatory for another surely?

**BrooklynBomber** · 03-24-2009, 05:03 PM

Simply because a champion for one major belt can not be a mandatory for another ajor belt.

**da_beast** · 03-24-2009, 05:04 PM

Originally posted by BrooklynBomber

Simply because a champion for one major belt can not be a mandatory for another ajor belt.

Is that not a major flaw in the whole system

**da_beast** · 03-24-2009, 05:04 PM

****ing alphabet organisations need to stop wasting boxing

**gingeralbino** · 03-24-2009, 05:05 PM

Originally posted by da_beast

Is that not a major flaw in the whole system

i'd call it more than a flaw.

**ButlerBoxing** · 03-24-2009, 05:05 PM

Originally posted by da_beast

Surley the same rules apply to them as everyone else. You have to fight the mandatory? They must be mandatorys for each others titles at some point or shall be soon.

I know that they would never fight but ffs. Is it just me or do i see a problem here?

Can someone please enlighten me here?

exactly what i think. its all corrupt. surly champions should be the mandatories for the belts they don't hold. how certain sanctioning bodies can rank champions of others sanctioning bodies at 6,7,8,9 is just baffling.

**BrooklynBomber** · 03-24-2009, 05:06 PM

Originally posted by da_beast

Is that not a major flaw in the whole system

Well, as far as I know unifications are possible with everything but WBA, they dont want unificatons with anyone at all.

**ButlerBoxing** · 03-24-2009, 05:06 PM

Originally posted by BrooklynBomber

Simply because a champion for one major belt can not be a mandatory for another ajor belt.

thats bull****. that just ensures that the belts are nearly impossible to be unified

**Banderivets** · 03-24-2009, 05:07 PM

Originally posted by da_beast

Is that not a major flaw in the whole system

Well thats the problem. THere is no system. THis is not the UFC.

A System is the WBC, the system is WBA...

Boxing is not globally united.

Why are the Klitscho's never mandatory for each others belts?