Why are the Klitscho's never mandatory for each others belts?

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • da_beast
    Interim Champion
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Jul 2008
    • 624
    • 23
    • 50
    • 7,003

    #1

    Why are the Klitscho's never mandatory for each others belts?

    Surley the same rules apply to them as everyone else. You have to fight the mandatory? They must be mandatorys for each others titles at some point or shall be soon.

    I know that they would never fight but ffs. Is it just me or do i see a problem here?

    Can someone please enlighten me here?
  • gingeralbino
    WAR MAGEE!!!
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Dec 2008
    • 7999
    • 224
    • 388
    • 20,405

    #2
    Originally posted by da_beast
    Surley the same rules apply to them as everyone else. You have to fight the mandatory? They must be mandatorys for each others titles at some point or shall be soon.

    I know that they would never fight but ffs. Is it just me or do i see a problem here?

    Can someone please enlighten me here?
    If u hold one alphabet title then u are never a mandatory for another surely?

    Comment

    • BrooklynBomber
      Banned
      Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
      • Oct 2004
      • 28365
      • 1,563
      • 1,541
      • 44,979

      #3
      Simply because a champion for one major belt can not be a mandatory for another ajor belt.

      Comment

      • da_beast
        Interim Champion
        Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
        • Jul 2008
        • 624
        • 23
        • 50
        • 7,003

        #4
        Originally posted by BrooklynBomber
        Simply because a champion for one major belt can not be a mandatory for another ajor belt.
        Is that not a major flaw in the whole system

        Comment

        • da_beast
          Interim Champion
          Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
          • Jul 2008
          • 624
          • 23
          • 50
          • 7,003

          #5
          ****ing alphabet organisations need to stop wasting boxing

          Comment

          • gingeralbino
            WAR MAGEE!!!
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Dec 2008
            • 7999
            • 224
            • 388
            • 20,405

            #6
            Originally posted by da_beast
            Is that not a major flaw in the whole system
            i'd call it more than a flaw.

            Comment

            • ButlerBoxing
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Dec 2008
              • 223
              • 4
              • 0
              • 6,293

              #7
              Originally posted by da_beast
              Surley the same rules apply to them as everyone else. You have to fight the mandatory? They must be mandatorys for each others titles at some point or shall be soon.

              I know that they would never fight but ffs. Is it just me or do i see a problem here?

              Can someone please enlighten me here?
              exactly what i think. its all corrupt. surly champions should be the mandatories for the belts they don't hold. how certain sanctioning bodies can rank champions of others sanctioning bodies at 6,7,8,9 is just baffling.

              Comment

              • BrooklynBomber
                Banned
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • Oct 2004
                • 28365
                • 1,563
                • 1,541
                • 44,979

                #8
                Originally posted by da_beast
                Is that not a major flaw in the whole system
                Well, as far as I know unifications are possible with everything but WBA, they dont want unificatons with anyone at all.

                Comment

                • ButlerBoxing
                  Contender
                  Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 223
                  • 4
                  • 0
                  • 6,293

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BrooklynBomber
                  Simply because a champion for one major belt can not be a mandatory for another ajor belt.
                  thats bull****. that just ensures that the belts are nearly impossible to be unified

                  Comment

                  • Banderivets
                    'Ah Mr Haye'
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Dec 2004
                    • 3659
                    • 202
                    • 74
                    • 17,721

                    #10
                    Originally posted by da_beast
                    Is that not a major flaw in the whole system
                    Well thats the problem. THere is no system. THis is not the UFC.

                    A System is the WBC, the system is WBA...

                    Boxing is not globally united.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP