Nate campbell: Juan manuel marquez needs to fight me

[-MAKAVELLI-]

nate without a belt = no fight

[BoriKua305]

Nate really is pretty ****** in that interview.

He talks about Marquez being "done", and says that Marquez beat 2 guys at 135 who were already "done" themselves.

Casamayor was on a hot streak going into that fight with Marquez (I know, he should've lost to Santa Cruz, but he didn't. And he bounced back and KO'd Katsidis in a FOTY candidate in which everybody thought he was going to lose.).

And then Nate takes credit for Marquez beating Diaz? Because he ended Diaz?

In my opinion Casamayor looked like **** against santa cruz i couldnt even give him a round(well maybe one round). Second casamayor beat katsidis whos showed he cant hang with the big boys by losing to a declining casamayor and to diaz who lost to nate. SO I still give credit to marquez but the fight with casdamayor shouldnt have even been that close especially if your the p4p #2 fighter in the world.

[2501 v2.0]

In my opinion Casamayor looked like **** against santa cruz i couldnt even give him a round(well maybe one round). Second casamayor beat katsidis whos showed he cant hang with the big boys by losing to a declining casamayor and to diaz who lost to nate. SO I still give credit to marquez but the fight with casdamayor shouldnt have even been that close especially if your the p4p #2 fighter in the world.

You understand how styles make fights right? You have 2 counterpunchers in Marquez and Casamayor. Normally, the styles that require less effort to execute are counterpunching and defensive fighters which suit "older" fighters like Hopkins and Casamayor.

Casamayor a slick, southpaw counterpuncher. He's always going to give other counter punchers issues. Thats why the fight was close. Not to mention the fact that he still has a punch as proven against Katsidis.

[warp1432]

I think Pacman-Campbell could have happened in JUne, 3 months time from his win over baby bull. and i know JMM wanted to fight Nate but Golden Boy made him take less meaningful fights. from what i understand diaz-marquez was signed and agreed b4 campbell-funeka.

Except not really because Golden Boy had already tried to get a Nate Campbell fight for him. Not to mention the Casamayor fight was for the true championship and not belts, so that's pretty meaningful.

And no it wasn't because after Campbell-Guzman was cancelled, they pretty much agreed upon Funeka-Campbell.

Besides, Marquez's win over Diaz is a lot better then Campbell's due to the way he won. Campbell didn't ruin **** against Diaz, he wore him down through the fight and cut him, but overall he didn't ruin him. Diaz still had that intensity that he always had before when he fought Katsidis and Marquez (for the first couple of rounds, till Marquez started slipping Diaz's punches).

[MANGLER]

I'd luv to see this fight.

[Bababoey970]

Also the fight with Casamayor was Marquez first fight at 135 and he Koed Casamayor who was basically the top dog at that weight division.

[mellow_mood]

nate without a belt = no fight

this

[Pullcounter]

thats smack talk. He aint getting anywhere near Marquez. He doesnt deserve that fight

you scared?

nate/jmm is a logical fight if jmm want to try out 140.

[MJ406]

Except not really because Golden Boy had already tried to get a Nate Campbell fight for him. Not to mention the Casamayor fight was for the true championship and not belts, so that's pretty meaningful.

And no it wasn't because after Campbell-Guzman was cancelled, they pretty much agreed upon Funeka-Campbell.

Besides, Marquez's win over Diaz is a lot better then Campbell's due to the way he won. Campbell didn't ruin **** against Diaz, he wore him down through the fight and cut him, but overall he didn't ruin him. Diaz still had that intensity that he always had before when he fought Katsidis and Marquez (for the first couple of rounds, till Marquez started slipping Diaz's punches).

I think that's why Nate is getting **** on the board here.

ruining Diaz at 25? Don't you think that's a bit much for Campbell to state?

so sure Campbell does get hated on here (some un necessary) but to say he ruined Diaz is just **** talking.

[egreezy]

Except not really because Golden Boy had already tried to get a Nate Campbell fight for him. Not to mention the Casamayor fight was for the true championship and not belts, so that's pretty meaningful.

And no it wasn't because after Campbell-Guzman was cancelled, they pretty much agreed upon Funeka-Campbell.

Besides, Marquez's win over Diaz is a lot better then Campbell's due to the way he won. Campbell didn't ruin **** against Diaz, he wore him down through the fight and cut him, but overall he didn't ruin him. Diaz still had that intensity that he always had before when he fought Katsidis and Marquez (for the first couple of rounds, till Marquez started slipping Diaz's punches).

You really rank Casamayor ahead of Diaz because he had the ring belt? He was almost stopped by Katsidis?