Where does boxing go next if Hatton beats Pacquiao?

[Deja_Vous]

Who's Hatton beat at 140 to prove he's the best at that weight? Answer that and then you'll see why Hatton's ****ed.

Pac picked the sorriest mofo at 135...

Why not Nate Campbell??

[strugler]

Pac picked the sorriest mofo at 135...

Why not Nate Campbell??

not the sorriest mofo, the wbc champ in 135 in his debut at lightwweight

[indew]

boxing needs new names and rivalry to see bright future in boxing sports. fight fans has to groom new talents aside from the sunset career mostly of the best crop of boxers today; jmm, pacman, pfb and hatton....another few fights of these names would screw fight fans of watching a bouts just simply for fun rather than a real ppp it cost us. fight fans hate to see these names leaving their glorious days flat in the canvass, defeated and aging.

[Dragon Punch]

Witter had no right to demand a fight with Hatton? How about the fact it would of been a brilliant British boxing fight and the fact Witter had the WBC LWW belt....the belt that's more prestigeous than Hattons IBO belt, LOL.

Tszyu held the WBC belt and still would have by the time he fought Hatton had he not been stripped whilst he was injured....Ricky has also been stripped of the IBF twice and also the WBA for not fighting almost exactly the same guy's now competing for those belts. As i'm sure you know Ricky won the WBA off Maussa who KO'd Vivian Harris for the belt who is the biggest win of Junior's career.....Basically, Ricky is undisputed at the weight whether you like it or not - the WBC title is nice for what it stands for in regards history, but serves no real purpose as leveridge when used to try to get a fight agianst the LINEAL/RING champ in Hatton who is also the economic powerhouse in the division to go along with his status as the 140 lb boss.

Having said that, If Witter had held onto the title against Bradley there would have been no excuse for Ricky not to have fought him then instead of Malignaggi.