they just use those long jabs. they aren't entertaining.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
All Klitschkos Suck!!!!!
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Johnnybur View PostYeah the word PRIME does mean something to me, a PRIME tyson at 20 almost lost to James Tillis. A PRIME tyson got KTFO by Buster Douglas, and Evander Holyfield kicked his ass when he was 30 and then when he was 31 which is when a boxer is normally at the pinnacle of his career, hence the word PRIME. Dont make excuses for him, he had power but if you were a good boxer he was tailor made for you. Name one good true heavyweight boxer that he beat. I challenge you.
next
Buster Douglass fought an etremely good fight and there is no shame in losing against someone who fights like that. No excuses, Tyson lost that fight fair and squair. But all fighters lose. Tyson only lost once in his prime.
next
Evander Holyfield did not beat a prime Tyson. 3 years in prison and in activity. You really are showing your lack of knowledge here. EVery fighter peaks at 30? Maybe if if you knew a single thing about boing you'd know that swarmer who always come forward take more punishment and therefor have shorter careers and primes.
next
Actually you just re-enforced what I already stated. Look at all the bums you named
Carl William?????????? Tommy Morrison knocked his out cold.
Damn thanks for the post, you added alot of what ifs and this guy almost beat that guy and this guy ALMOST beat this prime guy.
Alex Stewart???? You honestly say his name like hes a great one.
Ray Mercer? Wladimir is one of the few HW to ever knock that guy out
Good try though.
Boy, you took some abuse here. Run along to safe face now, Johnny boy, and learn something about boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostTyson was 19 and very inexperienced against Tillis. In fact that was his first step up in competition and he won that fight on all judges scorecards.
next
Buster Douglass fought an etremely good fight and there is no shame in losing against someone who fights like that. No excuses, Tyson lost that fight fair and squair. But all fighters lose. Tyson only lost once in his prime.
next
Evander Holyfield did not beat a prime Tyson. 3 years in prison and in activity. You really are showing your lack of knowledge here. EVery fighter peaks at 30? Maybe if if you knew a single thing about boing you'd know that swarmer who always come forward take more punishment and therefor have shorter careers and primes.
next
Just because you have never heard of them doesn't make them bums. It just means you know nothing, Johnny boy.
Guess what? Tyson did that first. And appearantly the part about Williams almost beating Larry Holmes went over your head, Johnny boy.
Actually if you know how to read and weren't mentally ******ed you'd see that in my last post, I was posting facts. Tyson beat those guys, those guys beat others good fighters and so on. Whats so "what if" about that? If anything, you're the one that keeps saying "If Mike fought Klitschko he would be KTFO YO"
I guess when I said that he was giving prime Evander Holyfield major problems before it was stopped due to headbutts, and him beating the **** out of Foreman went completely over your head again, Johnny boy.
When he was shot to **** and old already. Ray Mercer took everything Morrison had to offer and mauled him nearly to death. Mercer went to war with Lewis and made it a very close fight. This guy was the real deal. You, for obvious reasons, wouldn't know.
That is your story on Boxingscene in a nutshell.
Boy, you took some abuse here. Run along to safe face now, Johnny boy, and learn something about boxing.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Slimey Limey View PostTyson was 19 and very inexperienced against Tillis. In fact that was his first step up in competition and he won that fight on all judges scorecards.
next
Buster Douglass fought an etremely good fight and there is no shame in losing against someone who fights like that. No excuses, Tyson lost that fight fair and squair. But all fighters lose. Tyson only lost once in his prime.
next
Evander Holyfield did not beat a prime Tyson. 3 years in prison and in activity. You really are showing your lack of knowledge here. EVery fighter peaks at 30? Maybe if if you knew a single thing about boing you'd know that swarmer who always come forward take more punishment and therefor have shorter careers and primes.
next
Just because you have never heard of them doesn't make them bums. It just means you know nothing, Johnny boy.
Guess what? Tyson did that first. And appearantly the part about Williams almost beating Larry Holmes went over your head, Johnny boy.
Actually if you know how to read and weren't mentally ******ed you'd see that in my last post, I was posting facts. Tyson beat those guys, those guys beat others good fighters and so on. Whats so "what if" about that? If anything, you're the one that keeps saying "If Mike fought Klitschko he would be KTFO YO"
I guess when I said that he was giving prime Evander Holyfield major problems before it was stopped due to headbutts, and him beating the **** out of Foreman went completely over your head again, Johnny boy.
When he was shot to **** and old already. Ray Mercer took everything Morrison had to offer and mauled him nearly to death. Mercer went to war with Lewis and made it a very close fight. This guy was the real deal. You, for obvious reasons, wouldn't know.
That is your story on Boxingscene in a nutshell.
Boy, you took some abuse here. Run along to safe face now, Johnny boy, and learn something about boxing.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Scott9945 View PostThe Brewster loss was a fluke because WK simply gassed out. I could use Buster Douglas to out the shoe on the other foot. The Corie Sanders loss is the one that you can't dismiss.
yes it was because wlad gassed but it happened before with ross.
not a fluke.
i think mike can take punches as good as lamon and you know mike (even though mentally weak) just keeps on trying no matter what.
mike could win in the same fashion as lamon or puritty. though i think mike was fast enough that he could spark wlad. you know wlad would be doing a judah when that happens.
i didn't want to use corrie as an example because corrie is a tall guy.
lamon at least is what only 6 ft.? 6'1? not much bigger than mike.
corrie is 6'4 i think.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scott9945 View PostThe Brewster loss was a fluke because WK simply gassed out. I could use Buster Douglas to out the shoe on the other foot. The Corie Sanders loss is the one that you can't dismiss.
the thing is though buster was very active in the tyson fight.
if wlad tried to fight like that (not saying he has to) he'd gas so bad and it would end up looking like the lamon fight.
plus remember the round before mike got ktfo? when buster got caught with that uppercut? wlad does not get up from that........
Comment
-
Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Postbrewster wasn't a fluke.
yes it was because wlad gassed but it happened before with ross.
not a fluke.
i think mike can take punches as good as lamon and you know mike (even though mentally weak) just keeps on trying no matter what.
mike could win in the same fashion as lamon or puritty. though i think mike was fast enough that he could spark wlad. you know wlad would be doing a judah when that happens.
i didn't want to use corrie as an example because corrie is a tall guy.
lamon at least is what only 6 ft.? 6'1? not much bigger than mike.
corrie is 6'4 i think.
Comment
Comment