sure, but evidence is empirical.
it is fact that margo tried to cheat against mosley. there is no evidence that he cheated in any other fight.
wrong! deductive logic is proving something by moving from the general to the specific.
what you are doing is jumping to conclusions.
that's speculation, conjecture, a guess, etc... not proof nor evidence. just because margo cheated once against mosley, doesn't necessarily mean that he cheated in all his fights. sure, its su****ious, i agree, but being suspected of doing something doesn't mean that you did something.
margo is suspected of cheating through out the later part of his career. the only people that are convinced of that are biased.
sure, he's suspected of cheating against cotto, but that doesn't mean that he did.
that's cool, but there is no proof that margo cheated against cotto.
because they are biased or easily swayed by flimsy arguments and no evidence.
yep wait for the rematch, because there is no proof margo cheated against cotto
IF ENOUGH PEOPLE PERCIEVE HIM TO BE A CHEATER...WHICH IS A FACT...
THEN THE CONCLUDED BY SIMPLE DEDUCTION...
what you are doing is jumping to conclusions.
HE PROBABLY WOULD HAVE CHEATED ON THE BIGGEST STAGE OF HIS LIFE IF HE CHEATED AGAINST ON WHAT MOST PEOPLE THOUGHT WAS A SPENT FIGHTER...
YOU CAN PRETEND THIS WAS A COURT HEARING ALL YOU WANT...IN REALITY IT'S A FORUM WHERE A VAST MAJORTIY OF PEOPLE ARE ALL READY CONVINCED MARGARITO CHEATED THROUGH OUT THE LATER PART OF HIS CAREER...
AT LEAST THIS IS HOW HE IS NOW PERVIEVED...THUS MAKING IT HIS REALITY MY REALITY AND YOURS.
I REALLY DON'T CARE EITHER WAY I ALREADY COMMENTED THAT I REALLY DON'T HAVE AN OPINION ON THE MATTER...AND THE ONLY WAY TO SETTLE IT IS WITH A REMATCH...WHICH IS GOOD FOR BOTH SIDES OF THE ARGUMENT...I JUST LIKE ARGUING.
A COUPLE OTHER PEOPLE FEEL THE SAME WAY FROM WHAT I CAN SEE ON THIS THREAD.
I THINK THATS A PRETTY GOOD COMPROMISE...AGREE TO DISAGREE AND WAIT FOR THE REMATCH.

Comment