Margarito beat Cotto fair and square

[Mr. Fantastic]

You same response are getting tired..you have been owned on this subject by many, so many times and you dont learn.
The answer to your question is the same as it always is.
Cottos trainer could have over looked it, but that doesnt take away from what he did...also the inspectors had already passed one of Margaritos wraps before Naz got to it and Naz had him unwrap to find the cheating....This same scenario could have easily happened with Cotto...you know that ...but your blind.

Owned??? Me?? LOL sure buddy.

You're the one that's blinded by hate. Cotto has a loss to Margarito and it stings you that he took that glory from him. lol Cry me a river.

[BoriKua305]

If you're going to call someone "******ed" at least spell it correctly.



How do you know that Cotto didn't cheat against Michael Jennings? You don't. So using your rationale that means we should think that Jennings wouldn't have lost if it wasn't for Miguel Cheatto?

cottos not known for loading his gloves and lying on tv and getting accused of it

[dondi330]

sure it "could" have happened w/ cotto, but you have no proof that it did happen with cotto.

Yeah and thats why we are discussing...duh?
what the?
This thread is for opinions not to prove facts....thats for a court room.

[Deja_Vous]

Margarito is so slow that you shouldn't get hit by him enough for his handwraps to even matter. An elite fighter would beat Margarito down even if he had cement on his hands. Cotto lost because of his lack of talent. He's a mediocrity.

Cotto(and many others) wouldn't be so overrated if more people watched HBO fights WITH THE VOLUME TURNED DOWN.

[Pullcounter]

and i already said that you prick i said theres no proof but you cant rsay he won fair and square either unless ur capetillo or margarito

margo won fair and square unless you have proof that he didn't.

[El Dominicano]

I already said that you cant accuse him but you cant say he won it fair and square but yet you choose to argue with me. How does it sound rediculous? he coulda started using it to every one of his opponents after he lsot with Williams because he knew he might not get another shot. Im just saying it could have happened.

It just does, to say he used it against so and so but not so and so. When on the real, neither can be proven.

No I ain't trying to argue with you, just make a point and your rigt, what you said is possible but there isn't any weight on it.

I just want to know, if Cotto beat Margarito in the rematch...would it prove that Margarito did cheat in the 1st fight? or if Margarito beat Cotto again, will it prove that he didn't cheat? I want to know

[ELHURACAN58]

Paul williams is a beast, i dont know if anyone at 147 can beat him

One name

Carlos Quintana.

[dondi330]

Owned??? Me?? LOL sure buddy.

You're the one that's blinded by hate. Cotto has a loss to Margarito and it stings you that he took that glory from him. lol Cry me a river.

YES OWNED on many occasions...you even admitted once so stop.
No one ever is crying about the controversial loss, but your crying that people believe he cheated because it makes sense to believe he did.

[Mr. Fantastic]

Yeah and thats why we are discussing...duh?
what the?
This thread is for opinions not to prove facts....thats for a court room.

And you guys are trying to make it a fact from opinions.

[5punchcombo]

Finished?? I was just getting warmed up in owning your ass. This guy, hate clouds you. Funny too that you think this has to do with him being Mexican, just shows your ignorance.

It really only has to do with gargling his nuts