[QUOTE]
Yes, but he still lost to a journeyman.
Who did he ever beat to be considered more than a journeyman before his fights with the talented but inconsistent fighter and a ringworn fighter who lost 3 out of his previous fights at 147?
Fair enough.
Originally posted by Dave Rado
View Post
The journeyman was the lineal champ when they fought each other; and he wasn't generally considered to be a journeyman at that time. Some boxing experts said they thought it would be a pick 'em fight.
The part time but still somewhat tough fighter was the WBC Jnr Middleweight champ at that time, and because Floyd was moving up in weight to fight him, it was considered by many to be a very risky fight for him at the time.[/QUOTE]
By myself also. Oscar was part time, but still talented. Doesn't change the fact that he cherry picked this fight for money. This wasn't the same Oscar from 1996, or even 2002. And there were more dangerous fights for him at his own weight which he chose to pass up.
By myself also. Oscar was part time, but still talented. Doesn't change the fact that he cherry picked this fight for money. This wasn't the same Oscar from 1996, or even 2002. And there were more dangerous fights for him at his own weight which he chose to pass up.
The only fight I would criticise in that list is the Hatton one, and even that would have been okay, IMO, if he'd fought Cotto immediately afterwards.
Fair enough.
Comment