Whats more significant? a win over hatton or juan diaz?

[Jose Rizal]

Hatton is the Lineal "never beaten at 140" division champ and is more accomplished at the higher weight than Diaz. Juan Diaz got his ass kicked by 2 boxing senior citizens. His claim to fame is beating another senior citizen "no mas" Frietas.

[flotorres]

neither one is that good hatton just beat malignagni and before that lazcano and lost to mayweather for me he is just good but not great the only thing he got is that sells tickets.for me both juan and ricky are the same significant.

[ShalafiV.2]

Diaz, a much better fighter and more dangerous opponent. Hatton is just a money name right now.

[strugler]

Diaz, a much better fighter and more dangerous opponent. Hatton is just a money name right now.

he is the lineal light welterweight, he never loss in 140.

[2501]

2 different weight classes. Why not make a poll, "Who's campaign at 135 was more significant?"

[strugler]

2 different weight classes. Why not make a poll, "Who's campaign at 135 was more significant?"

Naaah. thats obvious. JMM.But i dont think its better than beating the best 140 pounder available. wouldnt you agree?

[2501]

Naaah. thats obvious. JMM.But i dont think its better than beating the best 140 pounder available. wouldnt you agree?

Your poll is completely biased. JMM hasn't even moved up to 140 yet. What happens if JMM beats 2 top 10 140 lbs where as Pac just beats Hatton?

If you are going to be comparing victories when both fighters have recently fought at the same weight class, only the victories from those weight classes should be compared when one fighter JUST finished a fight and plans to move to the weight class the other moved to.

JMM plans to fight at 140. Make this poll when they've both compaigned at 140.

[strugler]

Your poll is completely biased. JMM hasn't even moved up to 140 yet. What happens if JMM beats 2 top 10 140 lbs where as Pac just beats Hatton?

If you are going to be comparing victories when both fighters have recently fought at the same weight class, only the victories from those weight classes should be compared when one fighter JUST finished a fight and plans to move to the weight class the other moved to.

JMM plans to fight at 140. Make this poll when they've both compaigned at 140.

how is it biased??? I wasnt talking who would be better at 140. I was talking about their overall legacy. Which contributed more to ones legacy jmm's win over a young juan diaz at lightweight or a hypothetical pac win over hatton. No bias at all.

[BlackHat]

Your poll is completely biased. JMM hasn't even moved up to 140 yet. What happens if JMM beats 2 top 10 140 lbs where as Pac just beats Hatton?

If you are going to be comparing victories when both fighters have recently fought at the same weight class, only the victories from those weight classes should be compared when one fighter JUST finished a fight and plans to move to the weight class the other moved to.

JMM plans to fight at 140. Make this poll when they've both compaigned at 140.

why not compare them at 126 and 130 then?

[-----------]

Some people are ****ing ******s on this forum.

Hatton is #1 at 140, and just outclassed the guy in #2.

Beating Hatton at 140 is better than 2 wins over top 10 contenders in that division.

****ing window lickers you people are, yes i'm talking to you 2501