More on Margarito Hand wraps!

[pistol whip]

I think Marg cheated against Cotto.

And I have no opinion either way until actual evidence comes out to prove things one way or another.

[Mr. Fantastic]

Hooray Dondi!!! You have the critical thinking skills of one of the dumbest presidents ever to hold office in the united states.

So True!!




Dondi = [IMG]http://c2.ac-images.*******cdn.com/images02/54/m_4c2e759de28e4416be741b6c51f5a545.gif[/IMG]

[MR.CHICANITO]

I don't believe the blood soaked on or slipped in, I believe Margarito could have sportsman hugged Cotto afterwards or shook his hand (there was alot of blood)...but if not then the blood was from a previous fight, which makes the whole scenario even worse.

this is all so funny either way both margarito and miguel cotto are warriors but the excuses need to stop **** happens in boxing and miguel cotto just got knocked the **** out..plain and simple and no the hand wrap this is ****** **** excuses cotto chin aint the best in the world someone was bound to knock his ass out its too bad zab judah almost did it but cheating ass miguel cotto pulled a felix trinidad by punching zab judah in the balls..what a ******

[BMWM3P]

He cheated and he's being punished for it whats there to come to grips with? He deserved to be punished and I'm sure his career will never be the same.

See I'm not really intrested in defending the guy and circumstantial evidence isn't evidence at all because as you yourself said earlier it isn't even enough to accuse somebody in a court of law.


See I can use the same argument with Shane Mosely? He admitted to using steroids before a fight with Oscar De La Hoya and went years without anyone detecting it in his sytem so obviously he used it against Tony because he knows how to get away with it.

See how ****** that sounds? And thats exactly how you and all the other Cotto fans sound when they make excuses for their fighter with no"actual" evidence.

All you can do is assume things but hey whatever makes you feel better.

The bottom line is that Cotto's record will forever say "Antonio Margarito loss TKO 11th round" and the only thing you can do is cry about it like a **** victim.

If you want to play dumb that's fine with me. No amount of proof will ever make you happy, you are to dead set in your bias that even Plasterito admiting that he cheated in the Cotto fight wouldn't change your mind. You and the othe nuthuggers will come up with new bull****.

Margarito has been exposed everyone knows he cheated and none of your nuthugging will change that. You are the ones looking like a butt****ed ******s who'll say anything to defend the **** they love.

[pistol whip]

If you want to play dumb that's fine with me. No amount of proof will ever make you happy, you are to dead set in your bias that even Plasterito admiting that he cheated in the Cotto fight wouldn't change your mind. You and the othe nuthuggers will come up with new bull****.

Margarito has been exposed everyone knows he cheated and none of your nuthugging will change that. You are the ones looking like a butt****ed ******s who'll say anything to defend the **** they love.

Dead ***ing wrong!!! If there was actual proof of Margarito cheating against Cotto then i would be all for bringing legal action against him since it was nothing more than assault with a deadly weapon on national TV. But i can't make that judgement right now becasue there is Zero evidence to back up any of these claims.


Look Antonio Margarito is guilty of attempting to cheat against shane mosely. I agree with his punishment and to be honest he can go **** himself for putting another black eye on boxing.


What i am actually trying to argue is that assuming someones guilt no matter what they did under diffrent curcimstances is wrong!


Is there anything really wrong with wanting to see evidence first? Is there?

[dondi330]

Dead ***ing wrong!!! If there was actual proof of Margarito cheating against Cotto then i would be all for bringing legal action against him since it was nothing more than assault with a deadly weapon on national TV. But i can't make that judgement right now becasue there is Zero evidence to back up any of these claims.


Look Antonio Margarito is guilty of attempting to cheat against shane mosely. I agree with his punishment and to be honest he can go **** himself for putting another black eye on boxing.


What i am actually trying to argue is that assuming someones guilt no matter what they did under diffrent curcimstances is wrong!


Is there anything really wrong with wanting to see evidence first? Is there?

In a court room you would be right ....but hello your on boxingscene.com
an opinion site.
Opinions do not require evidence no matter how many times you request it.

[BMWM3P]

Dead ***ing wrong!!! If there was actual proof of Margarito cheating against Cotto then i would be all for bringing legal action against him since it was nothing more than assault with a deadly weapon on national TV. But i can't make that judgement right now becasue there is Zero evidence to back up any of these claims.


Look Antonio Margarito is guilty of attempting to cheat against shane mosely. I agree with his punishment and to be honest he can go **** himself for putting another black eye on boxing.


What i am actually trying to argue is that assuming someones guilt no matter what they did under diffrent curcimstances is wrong!


Is there anything really wrong with wanting to see evidence first? Is there?

I would no if he was not a proven cheater already. I don't know if you speak spanish but there's this saying, "Crea fama y acuestate a dormir."

If you are a proven cheater then what's wrong with questioning if the cheater cheated in other fights?

[pistol whip]

In a court room you would be right ....but hello your on boxingscene.com
an opinion site.
Opinions do not require evidence no matter how many times you request it.

What? This is a message board you twit how the *** else are we supposed to discuss anything if you can't challange somebody elses opinion?

Im not saying you can't have your own opinion on things but if you don't want anyone to challange that opinion don't put it on an open forum designed for people to discuss various topics. Thats the point of a message board!! To discuss and challange each others opinions. Thats what us civalized people call debate!

*** you're dumb!

[dondi330]

I would no if he was not a proven cheater already. I don't know if you speak spanish but there's this saying, "Crea fama y acuestate a dormir."

If you are a proven cheater then what's wrong with questioning if the cheater cheated in other fights?

Very well said.

The right to receiving the "benefit of the doubt" is for people or in this case fighters who have never been suspended for doing something illegal(cheating).

Now "reason for su****ion" is saved for the cheaters.
EVIDENCE of cheating is what opened up these doors.

If your caught in bank vault after the bank is closed but you didn't actually take money....I think its fair to assume that if you didn't get busted you would have walked out of the bank with money.

[pistol whip]

I would no if he was not a proven cheater already. I don't know if you speak spanish but there's this saying, "Crea fama y acuestate a dormir."

If you are a proven cheater then what's wrong with questioning if the cheater cheated in other fights?

oh no I don't have any problem with saying that you suspect Tony of cheating but there is a fine line between suspecting someone of wrong doing and straight out accusing them of wrongdoing with no evidence of backing it up.