More on Margarito Hand wraps!

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dondi330
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2006
    • 2420
    • 58
    • 0
    • 2,700

    #91
    Originally posted by pistol whip
    What? This is a message board you twit how the *** else are we supposed to discuss anything if you can't challange somebody elses opinion?

    Im not saying you can't have your own opinion on things but if you don't want anyone to challange that opinion don't put it on an open forum designed for people to discuss various topics. Thats the point of a message board!! To discuss and challange each others opinions. Thats what us civalized people call debate!

    *** you're dumb!
    Oh man your truly in your own world. I love to debate with people on their opinions,I love a challenge and welcome it. Your the pea brain who keeps ASKING PEOPLE TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OR SHUT UP if they don't have anything on Margarito....lol
    All you keep doing is jumping back and forth changing what you've said and what you feel. Your not making sense. Now your using my argument like your the first to say it..lol
    Last edited by dondi330; 02-28-2009, 06:16 PM.

    Comment

    • pistol whip
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Aug 2008
      • 8645
      • 255
      • 4
      • 15,040

      #92
      Originally posted by dondi330
      Very well said.

      The right to receiving the "benefit of the doubt" is for people or in this case fighters who have never been suspended for doing something illegal(cheating).
      And I think that is one of the main reasons why people like me and you are more likely to get ***ed with by cops in this country while we are walking down the street at night. Most cops see a Mexican like me or a Puerto rican like you(if you are puerto rican) and they say " oh I always bust puerto Ricans/ Mexicans who are up to no good so obviously this guy is up to no good".

      It's the same train of thought that makes the American justice sytem a sham and sends hundreds of innocent people to jail annually.

      Comment

      • pistol whip
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 8645
        • 255
        • 4
        • 15,040

        #93
        Originally posted by dondi330
        Oh man your truly in your own world. I love to debate with people on their opinions,I love a challenge and welcome it.
        Seriously you said that Margarito cheated against Cotto. I asked you "and where is your proof" and you responded with " I don't need any proof".

        Sound to me that you don't want to be challanged by anyone.

        We should just blindly agree with you because you say so? Get the *** outta here with that ****!

        Comment

        • dondi330
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Oct 2006
          • 2420
          • 58
          • 0
          • 2,700

          #94
          Originally posted by pistol whip
          And I think that is one of the main reasons why people like me and you are more likely to get ***ed with by cops in this country while we are walking down the street at night. Most cops see a Mexican like me or a Puerto rican like you(if you are puerto rican) and they say " oh I always bust puerto Ricans/ Mexicans who are up to no good so obviously this guy is up to no good".

          It's the same train of thought that makes the American justice sytem a sham and sends hundreds of innocent people to jail annually.
          Damn you just took an opinion that Margarito cheated and turned it into racial profiling.
          Whoa...Im done here. I think your defending Margarito is becoming a bit scary and irrational.
          Its simple ..popular OPINION believe Margarito cheated before the Mosley fight(but not against Cotto if it makes you happy) but most surely against many others that were "more of a threat"(sarcasm).
          When we have polls on CNN or ESPN or any of the other networks..I guess we will have to implement the "pistol whip rule". Must have evidence and or proof to have an opinion on these polls...lol

          Comment

          • dondi330
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Oct 2006
            • 2420
            • 58
            • 0
            • 2,700

            #95
            Originally posted by pistol whip
            Seriously you said that Margarito cheated against Cotto. I asked you "and where is your proof" and you responded with " I don't need any proof".

            Doesn't sound to me that you want to be challanged by anyone. We should just blindly agree with you because you say so.
            Nope, don't agree with me, but I welcome an OPINION that doesn't tell me I don't have a right to have an opinion without evidence.
            I still need no proof.

            Comment

            • BMWM3P
              Undisputed Champion
              Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
              • Apr 2008
              • 5402
              • 245
              • 345
              • 12,386

              #96
              Originally posted by pistol whip
              oh no I don't have any problem with saying that you suspect Tony of cheating but there is a fine line between suspecting someone of wrong doing and straight out accusing them of wrongdoing with no evidence of backing it up.
              Sometimes you don't need hard evidence to know that someone who's has been proven of wrong doing is guilty. In this instance the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming there's to many things that point to his guilt. So to me that's more than enough to accuse this proven cheater of cheating.

              Comment

              • pistol whip
                Undisputed Champion
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Aug 2008
                • 8645
                • 255
                • 4
                • 15,040

                #97
                Originally posted by dondi330
                \.
                . I think your defending Margarito

                See and through this entire thread this has been you sanctuary simply because you can't make a sophisticated argument to save your life. I have already explained that im not defending the guy but yet you continue to bring it up as if the more times you say it that it somhow makes it true.

                Again next time you express your opinion you might want to have somthing to back yourself up with instead of just blurting out whatever dumb**** just pops into your head.

                Comment

                • pistol whip
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Aug 2008
                  • 8645
                  • 255
                  • 4
                  • 15,040

                  #98
                  Originally posted by BMWM3P
                  Sometimes you don't need hard evidence to know that someone who's has been proven of wrong doing is guilty. In this instance the circumstantial evidence is overwhelming there's to many things that point to his guilt. So to me that's more than enough to accuse this proven cheater of cheating.
                  And thats where me and your opinions differ because I give people the benifit of the doubt no matter who they are.

                  I in good conscience can't go around accusing people of things without evidence because what if I'm wrong?

                  Comment

                  • dondi330
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2006
                    • 2420
                    • 58
                    • 0
                    • 2,700

                    #99
                    Originally posted by pistol whip
                    whatever dumb**** just pops into your head.
                    This guy has been cutting up my quotes like I just did to his(to prove a point)
                    He ignores everything that hurts his little debate and theN responds to what he hand picks...WHAT A LOSER..HE HAS BEEN DOING THIS ALL DAY.


                    DUMB****...YOU RESORT TO NAME CALLING...LOL

                    THIS IS HOW HE HANDLES ME.

                    I ask anyone to scroll up and see how this guy has done this and has flip flopped on the subject...this guys just weird.

                    Comment

                    • ELHURACAN58
                      Weather Controller
                      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 3098
                      • 140
                      • 55
                      • 10,311

                      #100
                      Originally posted by BMWM3P
                      Another puta showed up to defend her man's honor.

                      Common sense chicano79us
                      I learned that logic beats common sense, so if Margarito beat Cotto to a bloody pulp and then lost to someone Cotto beat, plus the fact that pics say that the sample has blood on the same spot a pic of the Cotto fight has, then logically, the probabilities that Margarito cheated in the Cotto fight are pretty damn good.

                      Its still an inductive argument because it isnt 100% proven Margarito indeed cheated in the Cotto fight so some further investigation is needed.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP