ANY WIN over Floyd Mayweather Jr., at THIS point... is ONLY a GOOD win.. not GREAT.

**The Gambler1981** · 02-27-2009, 12:43 AM

Haha, don't do em like that.

**yesiamhandsome** · 02-27-2009, 12:45 AM

Originally posted by reedickyaluss

If Roys win, where he moved UP in weight to beat an undefeated 44-0, BIGGER ACTIVE Pound for Pound fighter and Champion of his weight class in James Toney, is dubbed as a "good" win and not a "great" win... because James Toney couldn't keep his weight under control.

THEN, NO WIN....

At this point... over Floyd Mayweather Jr. is a "GREAT" win, because he has 2 years (and counting) of inactivity. It would be a "good" win, and nothing more.

As far as this forums logic is concerned anyway.

The truth!!! but floyd will never lose. guaranteed

**-Antonio-** · 02-27-2009, 12:45 AM

I think it's because it was widely reported that Toney was extremely weight drained going into that fight. I dont think that Roy's fault though. It's a great win regardless.

**Dan...** · 02-27-2009, 12:45 AM

To be fair Reed the poll for the thread in question is like 27-4 or something like that in favour of great win. Which it of course was.

**THE REED** · 02-27-2009, 12:47 AM

Originally posted by -Antonio-

I think it's because it was widely reported that Toney was extremely weight drained going into that fight. I dont think that Roy's fault though. It's a great win regardless.

Well it' FACTUAL that Floyd has 2 years + of inactivity...

MAYBE this will stop the people who hate on floyd to STOP chasing Floyd for a fight with their favorite fighter.. because, you wouldnt gain what you WANTED out of it.

There would ALWAYS be that asterisk... you didn't beat a prime active Floyd...

**el malo** · 02-27-2009, 12:47 AM

Originally posted by reedickyaluss

If Roys win, where he moved UP in weight to beat an undefeated 44-0, BIGGER ACTIVE Pound for Pound fighter and Champion of his weight class in James Toney, is dubbed as a "good" win and not a "great" win... because James Toney couldn't keep his weight under control.

THEN, NO WIN....

At this point... over Floyd Mayweather Jr. is a "GREAT" win, because he has 2 years (and counting) of inactivity. It would be a "good" win, and nothing more.

As far as this forums logic is concerned anyway.

cosign, and that would also be the excuse for him losing.

**Silencers** · 02-27-2009, 12:48 AM

That would be true if Mayweather loses in his first fight back, if Mayweather comes back and wins fights like he used to with the same form he showed before his layoff and then loses, then it would still be a great win.

**THE REED** · 02-27-2009, 12:49 AM

Originally posted by Silencers

That would be true if Mayweather loses in his first fight back, if Mayweather comes back and wins fights like he used to with the same form he showed before his layoff and then loses, then it would still be a great win.

That's why I said at "this" point.

**MANGLER** · 02-27-2009, 12:52 AM

He ain't gonna fight anybody anyway.

ANY WIN over Floyd Mayweather Jr., at THIS point... is ONLY a GOOD win.. not GREAT.