Klitschko files title defense complaint

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MELLY-MEL...
    Broken, Beat, Scarred
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2007
    • 11274
    • 1,059
    • 1,667
    • 33,296

    #1

    Klitschko files title defense complaint

    Klitschko files title defense complaint

    BERLIN -- Heavyweight champion Vitali Klitschko has filed a complaint with the Court of Arbitration for Sport against a WBC order to make two mandatory defenses in a row, his manager said on Wednesday.

    Klitschko will defend his title on March 21 in Stuttgart against Cuban Juan Carlos Gomez in the first mandatory fight.

    The WBC had decided that Ukrainian Klitschko must also fight former champion Oleg Maskaev within four months after the Gomez bout.

    "Normally there is a year between mandatory title defenses," Klitschko's manager Bernd Boente told German news agency SID, adding his fighter was not prepared to take on Maskaev because of this.

    He said Klitschko, 37, should also not have to fight two mandatory bouts in a row.

    Klitschko instead would prefer to fight Briton David Haye or American Chris Arreola in the second half of the year to obtain more lucrative deals, his team has said.

    CAS was unavailable for a comment when contacted by Reuters.

    Russian Maskaev lost his title to Nigerian Samuel Peter in March last year before Klitschko claimed it in October with a clear win over Peter
  • joe strong
    Average Joe
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jan 2009
    • 17972
    • 1,813
    • 868
    • 58,015

    #2
    vitali seems to forget he fights gomez in 3 weeks.he seems to have to much going on outside the ring,& looking at his next opponents before he takes care of buisness.I think gomez may win because of this.looking past gomez is a mistake! You heard it from me 1st

    Comment

    • Randall_Hopkirk
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • May 2007
      • 2351
      • 99
      • 131
      • 8,895

      #3
      I'm with Vitali on this another mandatory would hold him back. Most mandatory fights are forgone conclusions just like a Maskaev fight would be. But then again that "emeritus" status he had is dodgy as well. Sam Peter could have a legal case with regards to the legitimacy of that process.

      Comment

      • hammerhiem
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2008
        • 4877
        • 129
        • 102
        • 11,163

        #4
        He definately has a point.

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP