I wish Hatton had beat Mayweather, Would have been better for boxing.

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • MANGLER
    Sex Tape Flop Artist
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Feb 2008
    • 30142
    • 1,705
    • 2,355
    • 46,598

    #11
    Had he won, I'm sure he woulda been willin to fight top WW's, even if he woulda got his ass whipped, which I think he would by any of the top guys at 147. In that sense, it woulda been better.

    Comment

    • -----------
      -----------------
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2006
      • 6207
      • 414
      • 742
      • 12,799

      #12
      Originally posted by Tengoshi
      An inferior fighter beating a superior fighter would never be good for boxing.
      But How would Hatton be an inferior fighter to Mayweather if he beat him?

      Your **** don't make sense son.

      Comment

      • miamijohn
        Banned
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Feb 2009
        • 1983
        • 383
        • 534
        • 2,354

        #13
        Originally posted by mangler
        Had he won, I'm sure he woulda been willin to fight top WW's, even if he woulda got his ass whipped, which I think he would by any of the top guys at 147. In that sense, it woulda been better.
        True that...Hatton ; If he would have won, would of took that win and tried it again and look even worst fighting a tune up or somethingmoney

        Comment

        • Miburo
          Double X
          Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
          • Nov 2007
          • 9112
          • 515
          • 356
          • 18,175

          #14
          Originally posted by GreatJoe
          But How would Hatton be an inferior fighter to Mayweather if he beat him?

          Your **** don't make sense son.
          Perhaps this is beyond your comprehension, but it's happened many times before. There may be no such thing as a lucky punch, but it can be damn close. I'm not sure that there's a single area Hatton was better at than Mayweather except wrestling.

          Comment

          • miamijohn
            Banned
            Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
            • Feb 2009
            • 1983
            • 383
            • 534
            • 2,354

            #15
            Originally posted by Tengoshi
            Perhaps this is beyond your comprehension, but it's happened many times before. There may be no such thing as a lucky punch, but it can be damn close. I'm not sure that there's a single area Hatton was better at than Mayweather except wrestling.
            LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!popop

            Comment

            • kocface
              Contender
              Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
              • Jun 2008
              • 278
              • 4
              • 1
              • 6,573

              #16
              i dont even like hatton or floyd, but i wanted mayweather to win because on 24/7 hattons trainer said mayweather would get robbed blind in uk. AHHAHAHAH so he is trying to say a place where money is worth so much and theres guards standing around not guarding ****, is a scary place? lol you would never see hatton or his old trainer walking around detroit, compton, paterson, harlem etc.... the hardest place in the uk is only equal to the toughest suburb around here lol

              Comment

              • -----------
                -----------------
                Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                • Dec 2006
                • 6207
                • 414
                • 742
                • 12,799

                #17
                Originally posted by Tengoshi
                Perhaps this is beyond your comprehension, but it's happened many times before. There may be no such thing as a lucky punch, but it can be damn close. I'm not sure that there's a single area Hatton was better at than Mayweather except wrestling.
                So what does boxing prove then?

                Perhaps this is beyond YOUR comprehension, but if one fighter beats another fighter (no lucky punch included) then surely they are the better fighter?

                Fighter covering all aspects of boxing, the better man so to speak.


                Why are you watching boxing if a fight proves nothing to you?

                Comment

                • -----------
                  -----------------
                  Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 6207
                  • 414
                  • 742
                  • 12,799

                  #18
                  Originally posted by kocface
                  i dont even like hatton or floyd, but i wanted mayweather to win because on 24/7 hattons trainer said mayweather would get robbed blind in uk. AHHAHAHAH so he is trying to say a place where money is worth so much and theres guards standing around not guarding ****, is a scary place? lol you would never see hatton or his old trainer walking around detroit, compton, paterson, harlem etc.... the hardest place in the uk is only equal to the toughest suburb around here lol
                  I highly doubt it.

                  You *****s use guns.

                  Try lying on the floor for 5 hours left for dead after being stabbed 10 times.

                  Comment

                  • Miburo
                    Double X
                    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                    • Nov 2007
                    • 9112
                    • 515
                    • 356
                    • 18,175

                    #19
                    Originally posted by GreatJoe
                    So what does boxing prove then?

                    Perhaps this is beyond YOUR comprehension, but if one fighter beats another fighter (no lucky punch included) then surely they are the better fighter?

                    Fighter covering all aspects of boxing, the better man so to speak.


                    Why are you watching boxing if a fight proves nothing to you?
                    A fighter can be superior to another fighter in every way and still lose on one slight mistake, though he'd win a rematch every time. If pure brawlers were to win every fight in such a fashion boxing would no longer have any science behind it and would become uninteresting. There was no way Mayweather would have lost Hatton save by getting caught with something bizarre. Deal with it.

                    Also don't act like I started the condescension, you were being insulting from the outset.

                    Comment

                    • kocface
                      Contender
                      Silver Champion - 100-500 posts
                      • Jun 2008
                      • 278
                      • 4
                      • 1
                      • 6,573

                      #20
                      Originally posted by GreatJoe
                      I highly doubt it.

                      You *****s use guns.

                      Try lying on the floor for 5 hours left for dead after being stabbed 10 times.
                      how do you rob someone in the UK without a gun?
                      "ello, can i take this from you"
                      "ok"
                      =(
                      lol

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP