I wish Hatton had beat Mayweather, Would have been better for boxing.

[-----------]

A fighter can be superior to another fighter in every way and still lose on one slight mistake, though he'd win a rematch every time. If pure brawlers were to win every fight in such a fashion boxing would no longer have any science behind it and would become uninteresting. There was no way Mayweather would have lost Hatton save by getting caught with something bizarre. Deal with it.

Also don't act like I started the condescension, you were being insulting from the outset.

The only "slight mistake" your talking about would be a lucky punch, which I said didn't include in my post.

Surely a fighter won't make a "slight mistake" all throughout the fight.

Maybe it's my ignorance, but I don't see what your getting at.

[-----------]

how do you rob someone in the UK without a gun?
"ello, can i take this from you"
"ok"
=(
lol

"ello, can i take this from you"
"no"
(stabbed 5 times before even seeing a knife)
(steal money, **** etc)
(runs off)

[Miburo]

The only "slight mistake" your talking about would be a lucky punch, which I said didn't include in my post.

Surely a fighter won't make a "slight mistake" all throughout the fight.

Maybe it's my ignorance, but I don't see what your getting at.

What I stated from the outset. That Hatton could only win via such a lucky punch, and that doing so would not have been good for boxing for the aforementioned reasons. We saw in the fight that Mayweather was superior in every aspect except perhaps holding and hitting - I didn't see any possible route for a Hatton victory.

[-----------]

What I stated from the outset. That Hatton could only win via such a lucky punch, and that doing so would not have been good for boxing for the aforementioned reasons. We saw in the fight that Mayweather was superior in every aspect except perhaps holding and hitting - I didn't see any possible route for a Hatton victory.

Ah, well then we are coming from different perspectives.

When stating about Hatton winning, I was implying he would win as Mayweather did against himself. (clear and decisive).

But I didn't post about that, mainly because I didn't think it would get talked about this deep

[2-smooth]

hatton is a bum

how is wrestling good for boxing?

[iecen]

I hope he beats Pacman, you just can't beat this type of atmosphere.

Imagine a Mayweather-Hatton rematch. That **** would be off the charts.

I don't want Hatton to leave the sport.

I wish I was rich, but that didn't happen either. Imagine my world if I'd been rich. You must be a comedian........................

[Butterball]

I don't like the Green Teef chants.

[C.Y.]

Had he won, I'm sure he woulda been willin to fight top WW's, even if he woulda got his ass whipped, which I think he would by any of the top guys at 147. In that sense, it woulda been better.

probably.. and he probably wouldnt fight tune up fighters like jennings

[johnm is...]

I highly doubt it.

You *****s use guns.

Try lying on the floor for 5 hours left for dead after being stabbed 10 times.

Yeah. Because real men use knives.

...............

[rizkybizness]

sure.............whatever you say,mate

too bad there's very very very very little chance of that ever happening, past present or future.

thats kinda like asking for your **** to magically grow overnight - it just aint gonna happen man.