I think Hatton may be a little overrated.
Collapse
-
-
how can castillo be ranked 1 at JWW with only fighting at 40 once before.
malinaggi has fought who to get that title. ndou!!!
maussa gets in a big shot on vivian harris. but other than that hasnt did **** in his career.
lazcano hasnt fought in 2 yrs before he fought ricky.
rankings are not always good sources to go by. look at the resume and really judge from thereComment
-
You asked for rankings, I gave you rankings and now you say "oh well now that I've been shown to be wrong i'll discount them..."how can castillo be ranked 1 at JWW with only fighting at 40 once before.
malinaggi has fought who to get that title. ndou!!!
maussa gets in a big shot on vivian harris. but other than that hasnt did **** in his career.
lazcano hasnt fought in 2 yrs before he fought ricky.
rankings are not always good sources to go by. look at the resume and really judge from there
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph...rweight--2000s .Comment
-
top quality fighters is what i meant. i never specified RANKINGS!! you as a boxing fan should know those are not top fighters. castillo yes. but at that time no. maussa never. lazcano was good at lightweight yrs ago. paulie solid. urango solid as well. in my opinion there were more credible fighters at that time for ricky to face.You asked for rankings, I gave you rankings and now you say "oh well now that I've been shown to be wrong i'll discount them..."
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph...rweight--2000s .Comment
-
Good post, hammer. I do not agree on the points you raised regarding size, strength, punch power or resistance.
Sorry.
I don't understand where all this comes from. Hatton isn't significantly bigger than Pacquiao in any department. In fact, he is smaller in everything except height and size of fist. Everything else, Pacquiao is bigger. He also holds the advantage is skills, smarts, ring generalship, and and speed.
I do believe Hatton's power is slightly overrated and Manny's is underrated, too.
Now, as I've said before, I do give Hatton a big chance in this fight, but I wanted to comment on the size/strength issue. I don't believe it, basically.
100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3Comment
-
Like Who?top quality fighters is what i meant. i never specified RANKINGS!! you as a boxing fan should know those are not top fighters. castillo yes. but at that time no. maussa never. lazcano was good at lightweight yrs ago. paulie solid. urango solid as well. in my opinion there were more credible fighters at that time for ricky to face.
Tzsyu was the best in the division in 05, hell he beat the 2nd best in teh division 6 months before he fought Hatton.
Castillio is better than anything else in 06/07, who you going to put above him? Harris? don't make me laugh.
malinaggi was better than anothing in the Division in 08, who else is above malinaggi? Holt or Torres maybe, Rees? I mean seriously who is he avoiding?
if you bring up Junior "****ter" Witter i'll laugh in your face, the guys a Joke battered by the first talented boxer he stepped up against, hatton would have him out of there inside 4 rounds, Witter is on the Stewart/Oilivera level of fighters, look at his resume, the one good performance in his entire career was against Harris and he got KTFO by Maussa!Comment
-
Comment
-
Hatton has some of the best footwork i have ever seen, along with amazing ability to cut the ring off.
I also noticed improved head movement in the Paulie fight, he only resorted back to old tactics in the later part of the fight when he knew Paulie couldnt hurt him.
Pacman is a great fighter, but he does leave plenty of openings for straight punches, and he too also has a tendency to lunge in as well. This fight will be competitive, and could go either way.Comment
-
Comment