Who wins the battle of the Nightmares? Peter or Arreola

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • M.I Truth ?
    Truth Personified
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Nov 2006
    • 3204
    • 142
    • 216
    • 9,854

    #1

    Who wins the battle of the Nightmares? Peter or Arreola

    Arreola is the better boxer no doubt. He has shown that he can get caught and hurt though. Peter packs a decent punch. Vatali showed the Peter can be frustrated and out boxed fairly easily. Both guys have weight/conditioning issues. So who wins and how? (Side note: If the fight was to happen I like Peter's idea of loser changes nickname. That's some WWE stuff right there.)
    24
    Peter stops Arreola
    50.00%
    12
    Peter pulls it out on the score cards
    8.33%
    2
    Arreola Stops Peter
    37.50%
    9
    Arreola pulls it out on the Score cards
    4.17%
    1
  • Guest
    • 0
    • 0
    • 0

    #2
    Make a poll.

    Comment

    • joe strong
      Average Joe
      Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
      • Jan 2009
      • 17993
      • 1,813
      • 869
      • 58,015

      #3
      Originally posted by mitruth
      Arreola is the better boxer no doubt. He has shown that he can get caught and hurt though. Peter packs a decent punch. Vatali showed the Peter can be frustrated and out boxed fairly easily. Both guys have weight/conditioning issues. So who wins and how? (Side note: If the fight was to happen I like Peter's idea of loser changes nickname. That's some WWE stuff right there.)
      how do you start a thread?

      Comment

      • M.I Truth ?
        Truth Personified
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • Nov 2006
        • 3204
        • 142
        • 216
        • 9,854

        #4
        Originally posted by jreckoning
        Make a poll.
        True. Done.

        Comment

        • M.I Truth ?
          Truth Personified
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Nov 2006
          • 3204
          • 142
          • 216
          • 9,854

          #5
          Its not Ali vs Frazier but it could be some fun to watch at heavyweight.

          Comment

          • WLAD_OWNS
            Banned
            Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
            • Oct 2008
            • 727
            • 69
            • 55
            • 1,100

            #6
            Originally posted by mitruth
            Arreola is the better boxer no doubt. He has shown that he can get caught and hurt though. Peter packs a decent punch. Vatali showed the Peter can be frustrated and out boxed fairly easily. Both guys have weight/conditioning issues. So who wins and how? (Side note: If the fight was to happen I like Peter's idea of loser changes nickname. That's some WWE stuff right there.)
            I disagree.

            Peter is the better fighter. He dominated James Toney, KO'd Maskaev in 6 and beat McCline.

            Who has Arreola beat?

            Comment

            • Derranged
              Banned
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Oct 2005
              • 46593
              • 2,126
              • 1,350
              • 162,628

              #7
              Its hard to say. Sam Peter has looked like **** lately.. I think if Arreola can make it past the 5th round he'll win..

              Comment

              • Silencers
                Undisputed Champion
                Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                • May 2006
                • 21957
                • 505
                • 235
                • 32,983

                #8
                Depends on how much Peter has left.

                Comment

                • joe strong
                  Average Joe
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Jan 2009
                  • 17993
                  • 1,813
                  • 869
                  • 58,015

                  #9
                  these are the type of fights we need to see in the Hw division.up until the mccline fight I was high on peter but now I think of him as another David izon(bigger thou).he's a puncher who stands in front of you with no head moment & displays marginal defence at best.arreola is very similar but arreola almost looks like he enjoys getting punched.neither guy seems to really improve their skills,they are content with doing what they do now.tua was like that as well(relied on the left hook).they are both 1 dimensional fighters.I say arreola wins by knockout.I can't see in going past 6 rounds.it would be bombs away.it would be nice to see another tua/ibeabuchi like slugfest...arreola within 6

                  Comment

                  • M.I Truth ?
                    Truth Personified
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2006
                    • 3204
                    • 142
                    • 216
                    • 9,854

                    #10
                    Originally posted by WLAD_OWNS
                    I disagree.

                    Peter is the better fighter. He dominated James Toney, KO'd Maskaev in 6 and beat McCline.

                    Who has Arreola beat?
                    Good point. Style wise though Arreola seems comfortable using his jab and setting up openings. Peter did look much improved in the second Toney fight but it seemed to me that part of it was that he was willing to out work Toney. Toney just didn't fight for some of those rounds.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP