There not "so called" they are actual genuine facts, they are not up for dispute.
He doesn't have the tools to fight at 154 and this has what baring on a fight at 140?
He hasn't moved up gradually at all, his first fight at 130 was 3 years ago he has had 8 fights at 130, 1 at 135, 1 at 147, out of 53 fights and 7 of those 10 where against naturally 122 fighters.
You favour a guys power because he's moving up over a guy who's power id proven at the weight.... thats backwards thinking of a nuthugger right there.
Lazcano has 0 fights as a featherweight, so how can he be a blown up featherweight? Let me repeat that so it sinks in Juan lazcano has never fought below Lightweight in his entire career. he also only has 1 KO in 1998 which is as relevant to the Hatton fight as the 1999 KO by Medgoen Singsurat
the standard wisdom is that when you move up weights your power and punch resistance reduces, this is backed up by Pac's reduction in KO rate to 50% at 130+
You fact are not facts, they are opinions, try looking up what a fact is.
He doesn't have the tools to fight at 154 and this has what baring on a fight at 140?
He hasn't moved up gradually at all, his first fight at 130 was 3 years ago he has had 8 fights at 130, 1 at 135, 1 at 147, out of 53 fights and 7 of those 10 where against naturally 122 fighters.
You favour a guys power because he's moving up over a guy who's power id proven at the weight.... thats backwards thinking of a nuthugger right there.
Lazcano has 0 fights as a featherweight, so how can he be a blown up featherweight? Let me repeat that so it sinks in Juan lazcano has never fought below Lightweight in his entire career. he also only has 1 KO in 1998 which is as relevant to the Hatton fight as the 1999 KO by Medgoen Singsurat
the standard wisdom is that when you move up weights your power and punch resistance reduces, this is backed up by Pac's reduction in KO rate to 50% at 130+
You fact are not facts, they are opinions, try looking up what a fact is.
Comment