To clarify the point, then in terms of Ring ratings the following are the only divisions where the US is leading (with heavyweight totally absent of any serious contenders):
Cruiserweight - if you count Adamek as really US... or if Banks beats him
LHW - By default after Calzaghe vacated
Middleweight
Junior Middleweight - though a Ring champ has yet to be appointed
Welterweight - This is really currently to be decided between Cotto and Shane. Berto is nothing more than a contender IMO
That's IT.
There have been childish reactions to this thread, lots of finger pointing and accusations, but really all I'm making is a simple statement:
Is the state of US boxing in 2009 the nadir of the US's involvement in the sport?
What the UK is or isn't doing in the sport is WHOLLY IMMATERIAL. Just because I'm a poster from the UK doesn't make that relevant in the slightest. I'm asking a simple question.
Cruiserweight - if you count Adamek as really US... or if Banks beats him
LHW - By default after Calzaghe vacated
Middleweight
Junior Middleweight - though a Ring champ has yet to be appointed
Welterweight - This is really currently to be decided between Cotto and Shane. Berto is nothing more than a contender IMO
That's IT.
There have been childish reactions to this thread, lots of finger pointing and accusations, but really all I'm making is a simple statement:
Is the state of US boxing in 2009 the nadir of the US's involvement in the sport?
What the UK is or isn't doing in the sport is WHOLLY IMMATERIAL. Just because I'm a poster from the UK doesn't make that relevant in the slightest. I'm asking a simple question.
Comment