Why is Bernard Hopkins so overrated on here?

[a-raines21]

before the pavlik fight bernard was ****ted on like he was in a japanese scat film..he beat a prime fighter in pavlik..more than i can say about joe calzaghe

co-sign..... larry just owned that ***** ass thread starter....... hopkins ftw!

[Zmlacksz]

His middleweight reign is useless, he fought bums and the biggest names are two blown up welterweights than anyone the size of Hopkins would have beaten. After all that is biggest win is Pavlik, Whopey ****.

[Mojita]

So a guy who's whopping prime and making guys look like they slap like windmills and defying the odds everytime he fights is over-rated? at 43-44? You failed.

[NeXt In Line]

What Time Is It?

EXECUTION TIME!

Chad Dawson, Joe Calzaghe, Bring Your Asses!

[Derranged]

Hopkins woulda whooped you Rourke!! lol...

[DiegoFuego]

Me too. He did it twice against Taylor and he also did it against Roy Jones years ago. He never shows any urgency when he's clearly losing or when its so close. He just jogs his way to the finish line.

and immediately blames the judges when he loses

[-EX-]

His middleweight reign is useless, he fought bums and the biggest names are two blown up welterweights than anyone the size of Hopkins would have beaten. After all that is biggest win is Pavlik, Whopey ****.

Not his fault the division was lacking. Hopkins wudda beat Tito at any weight. Along with Pavlik and Tarver. Those guys just aint on his level. And Oscar jus got caught. Tough luck for him. And he beat Glen Johnson.

[Spacey1991]

The thread starter should have made a poll... it certainly would have been a landslide (everyone would click no besides the odd person who knows nothing about boxing).