mayweather v whitiker?
Collapse
-
-
No but one of Pea's best traits was the fact that he was so short and consistently got shorter - crouching low, etc. Having a height and reach advantage over Pea meant nothing. Everyone did.
But who am I kidding? Not speaking to you specifically but a lot of these cats probably started watching Pea around the DLH fight. And these same guys grew up thinking Mayweather is the best thing they've ever seen.Comment
-
No but one of Pea's best traits was the fact that he was so short and consistently got shorter - crouching low, etc. Having a height and reach advantage over Pea meant nothing. Everyone did.
But who am I kidding? Not speaking to you specifically but a lot of these cats probably started watching Pea around the DLH fight. And these same guys grew up thinking Mayweather is the best thing they've ever seen.Comment
-
Or that (gasp!) not only was Pea as dominant as Floyd was but he did it against better opposition.Comment
-
Comment
-
No but one of Pea's best traits was the fact that he was so short and consistently got shorter - crouching low, etc. Having a height and reach advantage over Pea meant nothing. Everyone did.
But who am I kidding? Not speaking to you specifically but a lot of these cats probably started watching Pea around the DLH fight. And these same guys grew up thinking Mayweather is the best thing they've ever seen.
but I'm working off the premise that floyd's and pea's skills will negate each other. If they do, then I believe the size advantage will play a bigger role than usual in determining the winner of the bout.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
ok, i get what you're saying... your saying the size advantage won't matter because of pea's skills.
but I'm working off the premise that floyd's and pea's skills will negate each other. If they do, then I believe the size advantage will play a bigger role than usual in determining the winner of the bout.Comment
-
Comment
Comment