How can Hatton be top british fighter?
Collapse
-
-
-
Castillo wasn't shot, or else he wouldn't have made the Ring #10 p4p. People like Max Kellerman said he was shot after Ricky KOed him, to discredit the win.1) Mayweather, then Ring p4p #1 (got KTFO)
2) will face Pacquiao, current Ring p4p #1 (Will get KTFO)
3) Malignaggi, world titleholder and Ring #1 at 140 (was obviously over-rated)
4) Urango, two-time world titleholder and tough as nails (barely won)
5) Tszyu, all-time great at 140 (was shot)
6) Collazo, world titleholder at 147 at the time (barely won)
7) Castillo, former world titleholder, Ring p4p #10 at the time (was shot)
8) Lazcano, Ring top ten at 140 (was old and rubbish)
9) Maussa, WBA world titleholder at the time (hardly atg material though)
See, where is the defining victory that makes hatton a god among men?
Tszyu wasn't shot either. He looked awesome in his previous fight, with Sharmba Mitchell.
You're only saying Malignaggi was overrated to discredit Hatton.
Hatton didn't "barely" win against Urango, he won 11 or 12 rounds on all three judges scorecards. Here's a summary of the fight:
http://www.boxrec.com/media/index.ph...=Fight:1107637
Be a good sport and be fair to Hatton.Comment
-
Comment
-
Yeah, but who cares about ratings, not too long ago Amir Khan was in the top 10, anyone who pads their record a bit can get a decent ranking. Castillo was shot, he looked dreadful in that fight and claiming him to be p4p material is laughable, what happened was someone made a mistake with his rating.Comment
-
2) will face Pacquiao, current Ring p4p #1 (Will get KTFO)
In your uninformed opinion.
3) Malignaggi, world titleholder and Ring #1 at 140 (was obviously over-rated)
Why.. because Hatton beat him? Was he 'over-rated' before the fight?
4) Urango, two-time world titleholder and tough as nails (barely won)
What does 'barely' have to do with anything?
5) Tszyu, all-time great at 140 (was shot)
Not before the fight, he wasn't. Do you see the pattern here?
6) Collazo, world titleholder at 147 at the time (barely won)
See above. Collazo 'barely' lost. I'm sure that's a great consolation to him.
7) Castillo, former world titleholder, Ring p4p #10 at the time (was shot)
Maybe you are getting it by now..... ?
9) Maussa, WBA world titleholder at the time (hardly atg material though)
Oddly, it really is difficult to find a willing atg every time you want a fight. He has fought Mayweather and next up is Pacquiao.. hardly ducking the best, is he?
Nobody is claiming Hatton is a 'God amongst men'. You are claiming, however, that Froch and Haye have better resumes which is completely laughable even to their fans.Comment
-
Now I think you are grasping at straws.Yeah, but who cares about ratings, not too long ago Amir Khan was in the top 10, anyone who pads their record a bit can get a decent ranking. Castillo was shot, he looked dreadful in that fight and claiming him to be p4p material is laughable, what happened was someone made a mistake with his rating.Last edited by ALT=_=Assassin; 02-18-2009, 08:42 PM.Comment
-
This goes two ways buddy... where is the defining victories that make Froch and Haye a god among men? Also, that make them have a better resume than Hatton? Exactly there aint none.1) Mayweather, then Ring p4p #1 (got KTFO)
2) will face Pacquiao, current Ring p4p #1 (Will get KTFO)
3) Malignaggi, world titleholder and Ring #1 at 140 (was obviously over-rated)
4) Urango, two-time world titleholder and tough as nails (barely won)
5) Tszyu, all-time great at 140 (was shot)
6) Collazo, world titleholder at 147 at the time (barely won)
7) Castillo, former world titleholder, Ring p4p #10 at the time (was shot)
8) Lazcano, Ring top ten at 140 (was old and rubbish)
9) Maussa, WBA world titleholder at the time (hardly atg material though)
See, where is the defining victory that makes hatton a god among men?
What have you got against Hatton... he is trying to fight the best out there you cannot blame him for that, and for the record... the Lazcano fight was just a tune-up fight to gain a little confidence after losing to Mayweather (which there is no shame in... 37 other people have lost to him, and nobody has beaten him).
Not being funny with you mate your entitled to your opinion and all but it just sounds like you are being extremely biased to me.Comment
Comment