Shouldn't Calzaque be considered a better fighter than mayweather?

[johncs08]

Floyd'd resume:

1 Corrales - B+ level fighter, not an elite fighter
2 JLC - tough fighter, but never really elite, defeated Floyd in their first fight
3 Oscar - OLD, well past prime
4 Hatton - past his best because he faded in the later rounds (declined after Tszyu) Floyd had referee's help
5 Genaro Hernadez - had been great in the early 90s, but a shot OLD fighter, his last fight
6 Zab - very limited fighter
7 Jesus Chavez - record of 1-13 when he fought Floyd

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php...4761&cat=boxer

8 Carlos Hernadez - good but not an elite fighter
9 Baldomir - limited and old, not a strong puncher
10 Gatti - shot OLD fighter
11 Manfready - good but not world-class level fighter
12 DeMarcus Corley - decent but not world-class level fighter
13 Gregario Vargas - limited opponent
14 Philip N'Dou - very limited opponent
15 Sharmba Mitchell - Tszyu handled him more easily TWICE, stopped a year younger version of Mitchell in the 3rd

this guy sucks...

even if floyd beats marg/cotto/williams

youll still have excuses.

"oh MARGARITO is a very limited fighter. hes 1 dimensional. hes just tall and big welterweight. he has no skills at all"

"oh williams is overrated. hes too sloppy for floyd. (remember he got exposed by a C fighter quintana"

"cotto has been down before and hes got lots of flaws. he shouldnt have fought floyd"

"clottey has been beat before. what makes you think floyd wont outbox him?"

oh my.. it wont end..

[DiegoFuego]

this is one of the worst threads I've ever seen. how can you even begin to compare Joe Calzaghe to Floyd Mayweather. Mayweather's resume destroys Joe's, Mayweather is twice as skilled as Joe, I mean it is a complete joke to even attempt to draw comparisons

[SonOfCuba]

Compare Calzaghe to Tarver or something, dont make a fool of yourself comparing him to Mayweather

[miamijohn]

Basically if you think Joe faced better fighters than Floyd did you are pretty ******ed.

I HATE Floyd, and i will say he faced better opposition than Joe by far....

[miamijohn]

this guy sucks...

even if floyd beats marg/cotto/williams

youll still have excuses.

"oh MARGARITO is a very limited fighter. hes 1 dimensional. hes just tall and big welterweight. he has no skills at all"

"oh williams is overrated. hes too sloppy for floyd. (remember he got exposed by a C fighter quintana"

"cotto has been down before and hes got lots of flaws. he shouldnt have fought floyd"

"clottey has been beat before. what makes you think floyd wont outbox him?"

oh my.. it wont end..

THANK ***IN GOD!!!!! ALL praise the mighty Floyd Mayweather.... The dude is a good boxer.... VERY far from GREAT. If HE stepped UP opposition he would be ruin!!!

[a-raines21]

This is almost as a ****ty a thread as "Calzaghe: Greatest of All Time?"

I can't wait till two years from now when he's long forgotten.

see thats a good point because unlike calzaghe, mayweather will NEVER be forgotten about

[WLAD_OWNS]

Calzaghe would **** Mayweather

[miamijohn]

Calzaghe would **** Mayweather

Yeah, literally.

[CaRnAgEViOLaToR]

this is laughable...calzaghe has only stepped up to the very elite once in his career and that was against a 43 year old bernard hopkins. and imo, did not do **** and lost that fight and some of his slapping looked so ****ing sloppy and at times looked amateurish. bhop maade him look really bad. his win over roy jones? give me a ****ing break. jones has been ko'd and domianted by BOTH glen johnson and tarver years before calzaghe beat him.

mayweather is just better than calzaghe in EVERY way possible.

[bsrizpac]

A lot of people consider mayweather a better fighter still. I dont get it, calzaque faced better fighters than mayweather did, he has more wins and knockouts. Mayweather milked his career, im not saying he is a bad fighter, but I dont think he did enough to consider himself a all time great. Who do you guys consider better?

Nice troll but you gave yourself away there immediately.