pacquiao will not ko hatton idiots.......

[S A M U R A I]

Nah you can`t answer the question because your computation is flawed. Yours is based on ROUNDS BOXED right? Just answer the question, ****head.

Hammerheim got it straight from BoxRec.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[hammerhiem]

Nah you can`t answer the question because your computation is flawed. Yours is based on ROUNDS BOXED right? Just answer the question, ****head.

Would you like me to list the 32 Ko victims of Ricky hatton?

[hammerhiem]

Hammerheim got it straight from BoxRec.

Indeed and used his figures for speed of Ko's.

[Thwf]

Indeed and used his figures for speed of Ko's.

Then BoxRec may be wrong. You don`t know their formula, you were spoonfed these data without understanding it. Then again, answer me this:

If this is my fight record:

4-0 = 3 by ko in the 11th round, my fourth fight I won by DQ at the 2nd Round

What is my KO rate???

Then I would recomputed it based on YOUR formula, based on boxrec and prove you all wrong. What is your exact formula for being absolutely sure? Just by reading the results?

[S A M U R A I]

Come on people, does it really matter? Just enjoy the fight. No need to over-analyze it.



100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

[hammerhiem]

Then BoxRec may be wrong. You don`t know their formula, you were spoonfed these data without understanding it.

Try picking up a calculator.

Heres the maths.

Devide 32 (no of Ko's) by 46 (total fights) multiple by 100 to get the %.

It's high school maths mate, not rocket science.

[hammerhiem]

If this is my fight record:

4-0 = 3 by ko in the 11th round, my fourth fight I won by DQ at the 2nd Round

What is my KO rate???

Then I would recomputed it based on YOUR formula, based on boxrec and prove you all wrong. What is your exact formula for being absolutely sure? Just by reading the results?

3 / 4 x100 = 75%

32 / 46 x 100 = 69.57%

[hammerhiem]

Hey Thwf, if your using the HBO record for Hatton KO numbers have a look up at the top at his latest fights.

Protip, He TKO'd Malinaggi after he fought Lazcano.

You can stop making a fool of yourself now.

[Edward Hitler]

first off ***** boy his style is flawed.....i never said anything about his loss, but i did say he has fought limited opposition, which explains y he gets ktfo on the elite level

second of all ***** boy, he leaps to the inside insead of workng his way in with the jab, which isnt smart considering his shaky chin.

third of all ***** boy, he has poor footwork. all he can do is come foward, get inside, and hope to tire u out with wresting. we see what happens when he tires.

so yessss...... ricky hatton is very flawed

just wanna say one thing all boxers are chinny if you hit em hard enough i dont belive in this china chin **** cos u wtch a lot of em and the punch that drops em would fell a horse now if someone went down off a jab on the chin but not a big right/left hand

[Thwf]

Try picking up a calculator.
Heres the maths.
Devide 32 (no of Ko's) by 46 (total fights) multiple by 100 to get the %.
It's high school maths mate, not rocket science.

Here`s my original post:

BASIS (+add recent fight) :
http://www.hbo.com/boxing/fighters/p...ny/record.html
http://www.hbo.com/boxing/fighters/h...ky/record.html

++++++++W L D Kos++++Based on Wins+++++Based on Total

Pacquiao 48-3-2-37----37/48= 77.08 %----37/53= 69.81 %

Hatton----45-1-32----32/45= 71.11 % ----32/46= 69.56 %
FAIL.....

Hatton 45 (KO 32) + lost 1 (KO 1) + drawn 0 = 46
rounds boxed 274 : KO% 69.57

Pac won 48 (KO 36) + lost 3 (KO 2) + drawn 2 = 53
rounds boxed 291 : KO% 67.92

Lrn2maths.

Let me see, 37 divided by 53 x 100 % = 69.81%, right? OIC, you did not include Pacman`s last KO dela Hoya!!?? Who needs elementary math and schooling now? Try counting Pman`s KO one by one, include the last.