Originally posted by The Surgeon
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Antonio Margarito's CSAC Hearing Begins With a Stunner
Collapse
-
-
You have obviously never heard of conspiracy. If you caught trying to break into a building, you will be charged with attempted robbery, conspiracy to commit burglary and a slew of other charges, it doesn't matter that you failed the commit the crime.Originally posted by 817boy View Postur a tool. he cant go to jail, unless he wasn't caught until after the fight.
It is against the law to plan to commit a crime.
There is more than enough to bring conspiracy charges, and there is enough to bring attempted assault with a deadly weapon charges, possibly even attempted murder charges if they really want to be ****s about it.
They can slap unlawful possession of a deadly weapon charges on him.
There is actually enough legal precedence on the books that they would have little trouble throwing Margarito in jail.
Comment
-
No, I'm not saying nothing about penalty, guilt or innocence, or anything of that.Originally posted by DrewWoodside View PostThis press release doesn't isn't saying he is currently recieving the harshest possible penalty. It sounds like it's saying if he is found guilty he will be held fully responsible. This isn't telling us much yet.
The California ATTORNEY GENERAL is on this?!? No wonder State workers are taking pay cuts.....
Comment
-
I would be real disapointed! for sure. But what if he's not found guilty? will you and the rest of you guys finally give him some respect? and take Cottos defeat?Originally posted by The Surgeon View PostIf he gets found guilty what are u gonna feel? U will stop being a Tony fan right!?
Comment
-
I find it odd they say the highest possible punishment is simply a 1 year ban, and then he can fight again. Why, why not more if he had an intention to harm with a weapon?
Whilst understanding why, it is pretty lame that he can lay just one glove on a guy in a fight then get caught, and penalised far more. But if he gets caught before hand, then somehow the punishment is drastically lower to the point it's really that realistic he wasn't fully intending on fighting with those wraps.
This isn't a case whereby someone is carrying a weapon like a knife to possibly harm somone.
This is a case whereby he was setup and had to have used the weapon on his hands, for they were strapped up ready to land in fifteen minutes.
Even then, just carrying a knife certainly in the UK, can hold a serious punishment. So this seems a bit weak to me, especially given this is a so called responsible professional.
Comment
-
They say starting with a 1 year suspension. Is not that the biggest punishment will be a 1 year suspension.Originally posted by KrisSilver View PostI find it odd they say the highest possible punishment is simply a 1 year ban, and then he can fight again. Why, why not more if he had an intention to harm with a weapon?
Whilst understanding why, it is pretty lame that he can lay just one glove on a guy in a fight then get caught, and penalised far more. But if he gets caught before hand, then somehow the punishment is drastically lower to the point it's really that realistic he wasn't fully intending on fighting with those wraps.
This isn't a case whereby someone is carrying a weapon like a knife to possibly harm somone.
This is a case whereby he was setup and had to have used the weapon on his hands, for they were strapped up ready to land in fifteen minutes.
Even then, just carrying a knife certainly in the UK, can hold a serious punishment. So this seems a bit weak to me, especially given this is a so called responsible professional.
You guys needs to learn how to read!!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
-
Comment