greatness

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • them_apples
    Lord
    Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
    • Aug 2007
    • 9905
    • 1,213
    • 904
    • 41,722

    #1

    greatness

    I was thinking, what's a better way of becoming a great fighter, by staying in a weak division and not losing for 10 years, or moving up a weight class and fighting better opposition, but possibly losing. If a guy like Sergio Mora stayed at 154 his entire career and never lost, would he be considered great? ( considering if he moved up he'd get broken in half, if he moved down he would to lol)

    Both Hopkins and Calzaghe did it in a way, ruled one division that wasn't the greatest, (although Hopkins has sinced moved on and taken better opponents).

    Calzaghe is being called great because he has never lost, but I think a lot of fighters facing his opposition could be undefeated to. Jermain Taylor beat Hopkins, he'd must certainly woop on the current RJJ.
  • Chr0nic
    Banned
    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
    • Oct 2008
    • 4501
    • 191
    • 213
    • 5,494

    #2
    any fighter with any life can beat jones now, all you have to do is be active

    Comment

    • 3_Hooks
      Banned
      • Oct 2008
      • 248
      • 3
      • 0
      • 316

      #3
      moving up and facing challenges is a bigger sign of greatness.

      Comment

      • El Dominicano
        Banned
        • Aug 2007
        • 10074
        • 226
        • 49
        • 10,758

        #4
        I don't know. I respect a fighter who can rule a division for so long but at one point, he has to atleast try and move up. I give Hagler the same kind of respect I give Duran...even though Hagler never stepped out of his kingdom

        Comment

        Working...
        TOP