Prime Naz vs Prime Pac

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RiZo is Gay
    Banned
    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
    • Sep 2008
    • 712
    • 58
    • 23
    • 855

    #11
    Originally posted by S a m u r a i
    Yeah, sorry "mate" but I can't stand the bloke. Never could. I always said he'd lose badly to a good, solid technician, YEARS before he lost to Barrera.

    FFS, Barrera used boxing BASICS to defeat his ridiculous style. Why are we even having this conversation?

    PS: When exactly was / is Pacquiao's prime? I'm not even sure he hit it yet.
    No one could understnad the "bloke" thats why he was so difficult to fight,
    the naz who fought barerra wasnt a prime naz by any means,
    the naz who fought robinson would have beaten prime pac mab or el terrible.

    Comment

    • RiZo is Gay
      Banned
      Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
      • Sep 2008
      • 712
      • 58
      • 23
      • 855

      #12
      Originally posted by S a m u r a i
      Kidding?

      Pacquiao has way too much speed for Naz.


      MAB destroyed his career. What makes you think Pac would lose? Pac is 10X better than what MAB ever was. And that's really saying something, cause I was a huge Barrera fan.
      Naz had lost all interest in boxing when he came to fighting barerra,
      you could tell he just wasnt bothered anymore.
      As a said Prime naz with brendan ingle in the corner was unstoppable!

      Pac to much speed for Naz??
      Naz had to much power for Pac....
      Naz had a chin to take Pac shots,
      Pac with walk right into a Counter and night night/

      Comment

      • boxasmash
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Aug 2008
        • 7039
        • 222
        • 63
        • 14,591

        #13
        prime naz beats barrera imo.

        Comment

        • S A M U R A I
          Bulletproof
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Apr 2008
          • 181694
          • 1,495
          • 1,324
          • 1,419,318

          #14
          Originally posted by richie kay
          No one could understnad the "bloke" thats why he was so difficult to fight,
          the naz who fought barerra wasnt a prime naz by any means,
          the naz who fought robinson would have beaten prime pac mab or el terrible.
          Stop making excuses. You say Naz wasn't prime?

          Well Barrera was 55 fights and 12 years into his career.

          Naz was 9 years and 35 fights into his career.

          A battle-worn Barrera clowned him. No one can deny this. Naz would not stand a chance against Pacquiao. Not a chance.

          Morales would have made him look terrible as well.



          100% free webcam site! | Awesome chicks and it is absolutely free! | Watch free live sex cam - easy as 1-2-3

          Comment

          • boxasmash
            Undisputed Champion
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Aug 2008
            • 7039
            • 222
            • 63
            • 14,591

            #15
            who can forget this

            Comment

            • MANGLER
              Sex Tape Flop Artist
              Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
              • Feb 2008
              • 30142
              • 1,705
              • 2,355
              • 46,598

              #16
              Pac at his best now has boxing skills to go wit his power. Pac wins.

              Comment

              • BG_Knocc_Out
                Undisputed Champion
                Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                • Aug 2007
                • 2284
                • 116
                • 358
                • 10,605

                #17
                Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                Kidding?

                Pacquiao has way too much speed for Naz.


                MAB destroyed his career. What makes you think Pac would lose? Pac is 10X better than what MAB ever was. And that's really saying something, cause I was a huge Barrera fan.



                Styles make fights, that is what they all say. Pacquiao and MAB are two completely different styled fighters. Pacquiao's fast, he's a great fighter, but once you make him frusterated, I think it'd be a tough fight for Pac-man. Believe me, we all know Nas got his ass handed to him by MAB, but that doesn't mean he's a terrible fighter. Nas is faster than Pac, has better footwork, hits faster, more ring intelligence, all that which needs to beat Pac-man. That's what I believe is the key to beating Manny. Once you get hi frusterated and explosive, if you time it right, Manny will be walking into your punches after that left-straight. Trust me, Pac's favorite punch, is obviously, the left-straight, Nas would take that into consideration during training and work with that, and you know he'd be to slick to be caught with that to many times. Manny keeps his head up and straight when he throws that left, there is no head movement at all with it usually, which is great for a counter puncher, I mean, what would you rather have, a moving target, or one that doesnt move at all. Manny can be very predictable at times, which benifits a fighter like Nas in so manny ways. A slick boxer who has great evasive skills, plus the great counter punching he can bring in. I'm not discrediting Pacuiao in anyway, trust me, I love the guy as fighter, but he's not Superman you know.

                Comment

                • boojee
                  Undisputed Champion
                  Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                  • Dec 2006
                  • 1577
                  • 55
                  • 73
                  • 7,738

                  #18
                  Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                  Kidding?

                  Pacquiao has way too much speed for Naz.


                  MAB destroyed his career. What makes you think Pac would lose? Pac is 10X better than what MAB ever was. And that's really saying something, cause I was a huge Barrera fan.





                  Straight left.


                  yeah, but this is a fantasy fight. so you're still wrong.

                  im gonna conform with the norm and say Prime NAZ by total domination, probably stoppage in mid rounds

                  Comment

                  • RiZo is Gay
                    Banned
                    Gold Champion - 500-1,000 posts
                    • Sep 2008
                    • 712
                    • 58
                    • 23
                    • 855

                    #19
                    Originally posted by S a m u r a i
                    Stop making excuses. You say Naz wasn't prime?

                    Well Barrera was 55 fights and 12 years into his career.

                    Naz was 9 years and 35 fights into his career.

                    A battle-worn Barrera clowned him. No one can deny this. Naz would not stand a chance against Pacquiao. Not a chance.
                    No he was not prime!
                    Yeah he was physically in his prime but his head at that stage wasnt in it.
                    Barerra didnt clown him as you said he used basic boxing,
                    Sorry but your wrong about Pac....
                    deal with it

                    Comment

                    • them_apples
                      Lord
                      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
                      • Aug 2007
                      • 9912
                      • 1,213
                      • 904
                      • 41,722

                      #20
                      Hamed would lose to any version of Pacquiao. Pacquiao is leagues above Hamed.

                      Beating kevin kelly is one thing, Pacquiao is another.

                      Pacquiao would hammer him at featherweight also

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      TOP