Nigel Benn: "Calzaghe Beats Me, Hagler, Hearns, Sugar"
Collapse
-
-
yeah tell me about it im having a good laugh sat at home listenin to em go on an on i just keep ranting to keep em here for longer haha even mr kkk thinkin hes got me beat with his redneck sister ****in waysComment
-
calzaghe would of beat all of them at 168 no question hagler never fought above 160 so u dont know how he would perform against the bigger quicker calzaghe in my opinion leonard and hearns were not at there best at 168
out of the list hearns stands the best chance of winning by a k.o but its an outside chance benn also
btw im not a fan of joe just calling it how i see itComment
-
Comment
-
Don't just talk nonsense back up what you said, you said my opinion was **** and biased. I challenged you on it and you have no reply, i don't care what rivalry you have with anyone else on this forum. I want you to answer and back up your comment regarding me, not childish insults and trying to avoid the question.Comment
-
I don't know why this is so hard for people to believe, calzaghe was far too big for duran and leonard, he is a big super middle with the speed of a light middle, and more importantly is use to taking the power of bigger fighters. I think hearns only chance to beat calzaghe would be an early knockout, but joe has a great chin and id expect his stamina and workrate would overwelm hearns in the second half of the fight especially if it was 15 rounds. Hagler calzaghe would be an absolute war and I wouldn't like to predict which way it would go, but I could see calzaghe jumping out and winning the first few rounds, but eventually hagler would turn it in his favour by making calzaghe miss more and getting to him with his pressure and possibly win by late stoppage or decisionComment
-
Fcuk Nigel Benn! what does he know! I always put my faith in carlton and his collection of boxing magazines,almanacs,wank mags and of course his trusty highlighter pen.and as for that mong bd,I cant bring myself to acknowledge him as he is from london and should know better...then again,it must be hard to see clearly when he has his tongue up carltons farter,and cheekslpitters pencil up his knot! like i said.prime roast!Comment
-
i never said i thought he looked good i said loats of ppl did i never said i was one of em do u need glasses or again are you some sort of idiot and he didnt look convincing but hey its like they say even the best have bad days want me to name a few for ya to refresh ur memory or can u work it out on your ownComment
-
Your not keeping anyone here i don't have to go out for atleast another hour, all im doing is debating and keeping my cool your comparison's and points have been weak throughout. When im ready to leave i will gladly stop this debate and leave your hardly important in my life.
I don't even know you and this is the first time i've spoke to you. All i know is that your some guy from London like me and thats about it, i was hoping you would be more sensible but obviously not. Thats always a sign of a weak poster.Comment
-
going off the topic a bit,I reckon that Benn vs Hearns would have been a war,what do you think?calzaghe would of beat all of them at 168 no question hagler never fought above 160 so u dont know how he would perform against the bigger quicker calzaghe in my opinion leonard and hearns were not at there best at 168
out of the list hearns stands the best chance of winning by a k.o but its an outside chance benn also
btw im not a fan of joe just calling it how i see itComment
Comment