3 fighters ..what number do you rank them 1-100 honestly

[Burner]

Im not being biased...I honestly believe Floyd is one the top 10 of all time...you coulp put him in the ring with anybody throughoput history and he would most likely win or hold his own..hes the best man....hate him or love him...

Whitaker was dumb skilled a true genius in the ring....

but Floyd is really on another level you guys will see that years from now wen we go back and watch the tape....hes a guy youd tell your son to box like...

[larryx]

Im not being biased...I honestly believe Floyd is one the top 10 of all time...you coulp put him in the ring with anybody throughoput history and he would most likely win or hold his own..hes the best man....hate him or love him...

Whitaker was dumb skilled a true genius in the ring....

but Floyd is really on another level you guys will see that years from now wen we go back and watch the tape....hes a guy youd tell your son to box like...

floyd is my sons favorite boxer...burner im not arguing floyds skills..personally i think he's top 5-10 skillwise..but his resume isnt that strong compared to other greats....floyd can come back and beat 5 more top boxers and move into the top 10 easily..but he wont

[evilp0ptart]

Im not being biased...I honestly believe Floyd is one the top 10 of all time...you coulp put him in the ring with anybody throughoput history and he would most likely win or hold his own..hes the best man....hate him or love him...

Whitaker was dumb skilled a true genius in the ring....

but Floyd is really on another level you guys will see that years from now wen we go back and watch the tape....hes a guy youd tell your son to box like...

What do you mean years from now? I have his entire career, I've seen every single one of his professional fights. Don't try to school me on Floyd fight knowledge. I've seen them all and I still say Hearns is a nightmare for Mayweather. Many other fighters would have a good chance against Floyd, but Tommy is one of the few who I think would have the least trouble beating him.

im hoping he was joking

Yeah me too

[Burning Desire]

hell that is impressive when you break it down

It really is people are underrating Pernell Whitaker in this thread, IMO he should only have 1 loss on his record and just look at all those quality names. Aswell as the title defenses i think he is for certain in the top 20.

If Floyd Mayweather beats either Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, Paul Williams. I'd have him just outside the top 20. And if Manny Pacquiao beats Ricky Hatton, i think he moves up quite a bit aswell because that would be a hell of an achievement, i think he would be in lower part portion of the top 20.

[larryx]

What do you mean years from now? I have his entire career, I've seen every single one of his professional fights. Don't try to school me on Floyd fight knowledge. I've seen them all and I still say Hearns is a nightmare for Mayweather. Many other fighters would have a good chance against Floyd, but Tommy is one of the few who I think would have the least trouble beating him.



Yeah me too

if floyd fought in any era.he'd never have more than 5 loses and thats damn good..**** it thats great..but he was just to concerned about that 0 to fully define himself..hell that 0 hindered him..cause when fighters lose that 0 they just fight

[MANGLER]

Where exactly I dunno, but Whitaker is highest, then Pac, then PBF.

[larryx]

It really is people are underrating Pernell Whitaker in this thread, IMO he should only have 1 loss on his record and just look at all those quality names. Aswell as the title defenses i think he is for certain in the top 20.

If Floyd Mayweather beats either Miguel Cotto, Shane Mosley, Paul Williams. I'd have him just outside the top 20. And if Manny Pacquiao beats Ricky Hatton, i think he moves up quite a bit aswell because that would be a hell of an achievement, i think he would be in lower part portion of the top 20.

true but beating hatton shouldnt move pacman up that much...cause floyd already beat him..so its not really fair to floyd

[evilp0ptart]

if floyd fought in any era.he'd never have more than 5 loses and thats damn good..**** it thats great..but he was just to concerned about that 0 to fully define himself..hell that 0 hindered him..cause when fighters lose that 0 they just fight

That's what I've always thought, if Floyd would just lose to someone, he might lose some of his ****iness and really unlock his potential to become a GREAT fighter.

[GERONIMO]

What's your top 20 look like?

im hoping he was joking

Yeah me too

my top 20 is my top 20.
everybody has their list.
I'm not an elitist.
i love how some of you wanna act like you know more than everybody else;
butsee the problem is,
who gives a **** about your opinion?
your on a forum, like me, poptart.
this era has to many belts to argue who the **** is the champ of what.
play and simple,
my opinion has to do with their skills and if they've moved up in weight successfully,
and how they would do with the rest of the best in the divisions they have fought in.
how many top 15 can you name that have done that and been better than those three?

[evilp0ptart]

my top 20 is my top 20.
everybody has their list.
I'm not an elitist.
i love how some of you wanna act like you know more than everybody else;
butsee the problem is,
who gives a **** about your opinion?
your on a forum, like me, poptart.
this era has to many belts to argue who the **** is the champ of what.
play and simple,
my opinion has to do with their skills and if they've moved up in weight successfully,
and how they would do with the rest of the best in the divisions they have fought in.
how many top 15 can you name that have done that and been better than those three?

All I wanted was your top 20 list so I could debate and discuss with you. This is a DISCUSSION forum remember??