Cotto is still the best welterweight

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • boxer12
    Interim Champion
    • Feb 2007
    • 586
    • 5
    • 0
    • 6,702

    #1

    Cotto is still the best welterweight

    yeah i said it.

    he only lost to margarito because of a non existent game plan and his plumber/trainer

    the only welter i can see beating cotto is perhaps clottey but thats speculation.

    a lot of ppl threw cotto away after the marg fight...forgettin how he got to the top. well...its time to remember

    he's the best welter....

    let it soak in
  • IwatchBoxing
    Banned
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Dec 2004
    • 10527
    • 235
    • 403
    • 11,555

    #2
    Cotto lost to a bum...

    Comment

    • SOY-COMO-SOY
      Undisputed Champion
      Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
      • Jul 2008
      • 2310
      • 76
      • 120
      • 8,655

      #3
      Originally posted by boxer12
      yeah i said it.

      he only lost to margarito because of a non existent game plan and his plumber/trainer

      the only welter i can see beating cotto is perhaps clottey but thats speculation.

      a lot of ppl threw cotto away after the marg fight...forgettin how he got to the top. well...its time to remember

      he's the best welter....

      let it soak in

      I agree. However he needs to rematch marg to prove it

      Comment

      • savorduhflavor
        Undisputed Champion
        Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
        • Oct 2008
        • 8194
        • 288
        • 59
        • 14,875

        #4
        You can't say he only lost to Margo cause of lack of a gameplan. He lost, it is what it is.

        My question is though...if the Cotto/Tony rematch does happen and Cotto beats him this time...who's the number 1 Welterweight? Because Cotto beat Mosley...it's all very confusing.

        I think Cotto and Mosley, skill wise, are the 2 best Welterweights. But you can't just discard Cotto's loss to Margarito, it just doesn't work that way.

        Comment

        • WaRCoTTo
          Banned
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Jun 2008
          • 1600
          • 48
          • 22
          • 1,819

          #5
          Originally posted by savorduhfalvor
          You can't say he only lost to Margo cause of lack of a gameplan. He lost, it is what it is.

          My question is though...if the Cotto/Tony rematch does happen and Cotto beats him this time...who's the number 1 Welterweight? Because Cotto beat Mosley...it's all very confusing.

          I think Cotto and Mosley, skill wise, are the 2 best Welterweights. But you can't just discard Cotto's loss to Margarito, it just doesn't work that way.
          If Cotto beats Marg in the rematch..it would set-up the rematch against Mosley..which would be EXPLOSIVE!!..

          I can't wait to the truth unfolds and ONE guy proves who the best WW is..

          I also wouldn't be surprised to see Williams come back to 47 to challenge Cotto or Mosley..which I think both send his ass back to 54!

          Comment

          • boxer12
            Interim Champion
            • Feb 2007
            • 586
            • 5
            • 0
            • 6,702

            #6
            Originally posted by savorduhfalvor
            You can't say he only lost to Margo cause of lack of a gameplan. He lost, it is what it is.

            My question is though...if the Cotto/Tony rematch does happen and Cotto beats him this time...who's the number 1 Welterweight? Because Cotto beat Mosley...it's all very confusing.

            I think Cotto and Mosley, skill wise, are the 2 best Welterweights. But you can't just discard Cotto's loss to Margarito, it just doesn't work that way.
            i dont discard it...its still shows up in his L column

            but anyone who watched the fight saw who the most skillful was...AND that he didnt have a game plan cuz he didnt even talk to his trainer durin camp

            i think margarito won fair(since no evidence of plaster yet) but cotto is still a better boxer and i believe a rematch will prove it

            Comment

            • Im Horny
              Banned
              Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
              • Sep 2008
              • 1155
              • 40
              • 13
              • 1,477

              #7
              yes he is. if it weren't for those cement wraps.

              Comment

              • Guest
                • 0
                • 0
                • 0

                #8
                Cotto is good.
                He's 2nd in my list, right after Hatton.

                Comment

                • IwatchBoxing
                  Banned
                  Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
                  • Dec 2004
                  • 10527
                  • 235
                  • 403
                  • 11,555

                  #9
                  Originally posted by boxer12
                  i dont discard it...its still shows up in his L column

                  but anyone who watched the fight saw who the most skillful was...AND that he didnt have a game plan cuz he didnt even talk to his trainer durin camp

                  i think margarito won fair(since no evidence of plaster yet) but cotto is still a better boxer and i believe a rematch will prove it
                  Everyone who saw the fight, was disapointed at Miguel, for not beating a one dimensional fighter, standing right infront of him, while he danced around the ring like a noob.

                  Comment

                  • THRILLA77
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 1100
                    • 15
                    • 1
                    • 1,402

                    #10
                    cotto is the best welterweight imo

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP