Complaint: The Ring's p4p list

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ИATAS
    Banned
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 36648
    • 2,509
    • 1,953
    • 50,835

    #91
    Originally posted by hammerhiem
    why not?


    Pound for pound means that if your took everyone and made them teh same weight they would be the best right?

    So why exclude Hw's?
    The reason pound 4 pound was created in the first place was to give someone of the smaller weight classes a value, like Sugar Ray Robinson they called him the pound 4 pound best fighter in the world, without expecting him to beat the heavyweights or guys in the bigger weight classes.

    I suppose you could do it your way if you want, I just see it pointless.

    And even if you do, I don't think there is a top 25 heavyweight if you rank the best fighters in the world. ****, the Ring Magazine's top 100 fighters...wlad and vitali didn't come in until 50 or 55 or some ****. haha, they division really is THAT BAD.

    Comment

    Working...
    TOP