Hagler/Hearns? More like Hopkins/Pavlik

**Mr. Ryan** · 02-01-2009, 12:40 AM

It's funny that MMA can't promote a fight saying this is the second coming of Lidell-Couture because it wouldn't invoke the same intensity and passion of saying Hagler-Hearns or Corrales-Castillo.

**warp1432** · 02-01-2009, 12:42 AM

More like Wlad Rahman. Dominant and boring. Hopkins Pavlik was atleast entertaining.

**Sin City** · 02-01-2009, 12:43 AM

I have NO clue what's going on.. someone fill me in.

**starjammer** · 02-01-2009, 12:43 AM

Originally posted by Howlin' Wolf

I have NO clue what's going on.. someone fill me in.

GSP won. The other dudes team stopped the fight after round 4.

**FreshPrince** · 02-01-2009, 12:44 AM

Originally posted by Howlin' Wolf

I have NO clue what's going on.. someone fill me in.

ufc 94. gsp-bj penn was supposed to be hagler-hearns like.
________
Ship sale

**heat27** · 02-01-2009, 12:44 AM

there was nothing entertaining about that fight lol

**MargaPutito** · 02-01-2009, 12:44 AM

Originally posted by Golden Boy 360

GSP is dominating

No, Hagler/Hearns was a war and one man got knocked out early. BHOP/Pavlik was a one sided technical schooling.

**Sin City** · 02-01-2009, 12:45 AM

Originally posted by starjammer

GSP won. The other dudes team stopped the fight after round 4.

I don't know what GSP stands for..
You are talking about the Penn fight right?

**Pullcounter** · 02-01-2009, 12:45 AM

Originally posted by Sensational!

It's funny that MMA can't promote a fight saying this is the second coming of Lidell-Couture because it wouldn't invoke the same intensity and passion of saying Hagler-Hearns or Corrales-Castillo.

well, that was no hagler/hearns

Hagler/Hearns? More like Hopkins/Pavlik