Did Mayweather really dominate all the divisions he was champion in?

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

What type of bull**** is this? Man, he lost about half the fights you listed. And you never mentioned who he won his titles againsts. What you think this list is supposed to prove? GTFOH

This list proves that he fought the best in each division he fought. Something Mayweather didnt do.

130-Jimmy Breadallh WBO
135-Jorge Paez WBO, Gabriel Ruelas IBF (Unified champ at 135)
140- Julio Ceasar Chavez WBC
147. Pernell Whitaker WBC
154- Javier Castillejo WBC, Fernando Vargas WBA (Unified Champ)- Ricardo Mayorga WBC
160.Felix Sturm WBO

[IMDAZED]

This list proves that he fought the best in each division he fought. Something Mayweather didnt do.

130-Jimmy Breadallh WBO
135-Jorge Paez WBO, Gabriel Ruelas IBF (Unified champ at 135)
140- Julio Ceasar Chavez WBC
147. Pernell Whitaker WBC
154- Javier Castillejo WBC, Fernando Vargas WBA (Unified Champ)- Ricardo Mayorga WBC
160.Felix Sturm WBO

Jimmy Bredahl was not the best fighter at 130, or even close.

The fact that you even mention Jorge Paez shows you just got off that boxrec. Because if you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't dare say he was among the best lightweights in the world at that time. Neither was Gabriel Ruelas who I had no idea Oscar even fought LMAO.

Chavez wasnt considered the best at 140 either.

I could go on but I think you get my point.

[larryx]

This list proves that he fought the best in each division he fought. Something Mayweather didnt do.

130-Jimmy Breadallh WBO
135-Jorge Paez WBO, Gabriel Ruelas IBF (Unified champ at 135)
140- Julio Ceasar Chavez WBC
147. Pernell Whitaker WBC
154- Javier Castillejo WBC, Fernando Vargas WBA (Unified Champ)- Ricardo Mayorga WBC
160.Felix Sturm WBO

resume=who you beat..oscars biggest win is vargas...his resume is pretty ****ty he lost all his big fights...floyds resume>>oscar's

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

Jimmy Bredahl was not the best fighter at 130, or even close.

The fact that you even mention Jorge Paez shows you just got off that boxrec. Because if you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn't dare say he was among the best lightweights in the world at that time. Neither was Gabriel Ruelas who I had no idea Oscar even fought LMAO.

Chavez wasnt considered the best at 140 either.

I could go on but I think you get my point.

Ruelas was a top LW, in fact DLH was a Huge underdog against him, and Paez was top 5 LightWeight at the time. the fact that I know this is because Im a boxing fan not a one fighter nuthugger.

I love how you twisted things. You ask who he beat for his titles and , not who was the best in the division. Again i gave you the list of top fighters he fought in the repective divisions. and who he beated for his title. he fought 10x times way better comp that Mauweather and thats a fact!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

resume=who you beat..oscars biggest win is vargas...his resume is pretty ****ty he lost all his big fights...floyds resume>>oscar's

Resume- people you fought.
Accomplishment- people you beated, their records, how you beat them, the titles as take and in what conditions!!!!!!

Oscar>>>>>>>>Floyd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[larryx]

Resume- people you fought.
Accomplishment- people you beated, their records, how you beat them, the titles as take and in what conditions!!!!!!

Oscar>>>>>>>>Floyd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

no no resume=who you beat..fact..oscars beaten no1..hes just a name on other fighters resume..fact

[realheavyhands]

This thread is worthless floyd doest even fight anymore... Lets vost his photo off of the website

[IMDAZED]

Ruelas was a top LW, in fact DLH was a Huge underdog against him, and Paez was top 5 LightWeight at the time. the fact that I know this is because Im a boxing fan not a one fighter nuthugger.

I love how you twisted things. You ask who he beat for his titles and , not who was the best in the division. Again i gave you the list of top fighters he fought in the repective divisions. and who he beated for his title. he fought 10x times way better comp that Mauweather and thats a fact!!!!!!!!!!!!

First of all, oscar De La Hoya never fought Gabriel Ruelas. He fought his brother, Rafael. Second, Oscar was not an underdog. Third, Ruelas was not considered the world's best LW.

Paez a top five lightweight at the time? Prove it.

BTW, the world's best lightweight at the time was Orzubek Nazarov, a staple of the pound for pound rankings for many years.

The reason why I ask who he beat for the titles is because the majority of his belts were paper belts. Meaning, he beat a title-holder and NOT the best in the division. I think we've already settled that.

And while he did fight a bunch of names, he lost most to most of the prime ones, in spite of getting every advantage he could get each time.

[IMDAZED]

Resume- people you fought.
Accomplishment- people you beated, their records, how you beat them, the titles as take and in what conditions!!!!!!

Oscar>>>>>>>>Floyd!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Resume equals people you BEAT. You don't list jobs you ALMOST got on there. You list your ACCOMPLISHMENTS. Ridiculous...

[Ch@mpBox@PR]

First of all, oscar De La Hoya never fought Gabriel Ruelas. He fought his brother, Rafael. Second, Oscar was not an underdog. Third, Ruelas was not considered the world's best LW.

Paez a top five lightweight at the time? Prove it.

BTW, the world's best lightweight at the time was Orzubek Nazarov, a staple of the pound for pound rankings for many years.

The reason why I ask who he beat for the titles is because the majority of his belts were paper belts. Meaning, he beat a title-holder and NOT the best in the division. I think we've already settled that.

And while he did fight a bunch of names, he lost most to most of the prime ones, in spite of getting every advantage he could get each time.

Same as Mayweather. Hes titles at 140, 147 and 154 were paper titles. the thing is Oscar fought better comp, than Mayweather and thats a fact!!!!!