Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Margarito cleared of wrongdoing in july 2008 over Cotto!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • to bad u cant really find out if he cheated. We will c what happens in the rematch

    Comment


    • Originally posted by americanme View Post
      Margarito landed like 50 punches on Cotto in ONE round in that fight..

      Shane kept Margo to about 50-60 thrown a round..by clinching and backing him up.

      If you get hit 50 times in a round you are gonna look like that.
      Originally posted by americanme View Post
      Mosley didnt hit Cotto has much as Marg did..nor did he throw 100 punches around at Cotto... go away.
      Mosley hit Cotto with 216 power shots...Margs hit him with 237

      thats diffrence of 21 power punches ...

      so your saying that Cotto can take 216 power shots from Mosley that we already established has more pop then Margs and he looks fine...

      but just 21 more punches from Margs and he looks like he smacked in the face with a bat???


      gtfoh.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by javelin_fangs View Post
        I'm not assuming anything. HBO made a report and I believed it. Just as the Washington Post made reports about Nixon and some people believed them. Others elected to brush reports in either case off. But keep in mind, I didn't make anything up. I'm just saying that I believe HBO's report. Are you saying that a logical person should not believe HBO's report?
        Don't even begin to compare a boxing scandal to a government scandal like Nixon.

        I'm saying that a logical person should not draw conclusions from a third party without evidence. Am I wrong or are you right?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by BOOMbip View Post
          Mosley hit Cotto with 216 power shots...Margs hit him with 237

          thats diffrence of 21 power punches ...

          so your saying that Cotto can take 216 power shots from Mosley that we already established has more pop then Margs and he looks fine...

          but just 21 more punches from Margs and he looks like he smacked in the face with a bat???


          gtfoh.

          oh gawd....

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Sugar-Mosley123 View Post
            Don't even begin to compare a boxing scandal to a government scandal like Nixon.

            I'm saying that a logical person should not draw conclusions from a third party without evidence. Am I wrong or are you right?
            First of all, how on God's green Earth do you expect just anyone to get primary sources on this? I'm not a journalist. I don't work for the CSAC, Golden Boy or Top Rank. So, how would I go about getting evidence myself?

            Second, a coverup is a coverup. Cheating is cheating; if journalists report on it I, as someone who does not have the means to investigate it myself, have two options. I can either believe the report that the journalists issued or I can question the credibility of their report.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by americanme View Post
              oh gawd....
              exactly...be quiet. you just got Little Puppeted.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by BOOMbip View Post
                Mosley hit Cotto with 216 power shots...Margs hit him with 237

                thats diffrence of 21 power punches ...

                so your saying that Cotto can take 216 power shots from Mosley that we already established has more pop then Margs and he looks fine...

                but just 21 more punches from Margs and he looks like he smacked in the face with a bat???


                gtfoh.
                I'm kind of su****ious of what Margarito might have done to his handwraps against Cotto, but there are too many variables in play than to base the argument on the state of Cotto's face.

                How many of Mosley's opponents do we see busted up after fights? The only one that jumps immediately to mind is Oscar the night we know Shane was on roids.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by javelin_fangs View Post
                  First of all, how on God's green Earth do you expect just anyone to get primary sources on this? I'm not a journalist. I don't work for the CSAC, Golden Boy or Top Rank. So, how would I go about getting evidence myself?
                  So then why would you believe it? What if it isn't true? I'm not saying you need physical evidence but the accusations need to be confirmed. Are they confirmed?

                  Originally posted by javelin_fangs View Post
                  Second, a coverup is a coverup. Cheating is cheating; if journalists report on it I, as someone who does not have the means to investigate it myself, have two options. I can either believe the report that the journalists issued or I can question the credibility of their report.
                  Cheating is cheating if it's proven. Journalists don't investigate anything. They simply report what they've heard and they really aren't reliable for determining whether or not something is true. If you believe everything you read from journalists then I guess you should do some more research on matters such as this. I for one will tell you that journalists are not reliable at all. They don't get paid to investigate; they get paid to report what they've heard. That's not all that reliable is it?

                  Comment


                  • only one way to find out...REMATCH

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by MissDeeCole View Post
                      only one way to find out...REMATCH
                      say no to a rematch, cheaters dont deserve rematches.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP