Winner gets 60 loser gets 40

Collapse
Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Scott9945
    Gonna be more su****ious
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Mar 2007
    • 22032
    • 741
    • 1,371
    • 30,075

    #11
    It's all about what you bring to the table going into the fight. Your reward for winning is the leverage it gives you for your next fight.

    Comment

    • Guest
      • 0
      • 0
      • 0

      #12
      Originally posted by Scott9945
      It's all about what you bring to the table going into the fight. Your reward for winning is the leverage it gives you for your next fight.
      Yes, and sometimes that leverage can work out five years past your prime.

      See Tyson and DLH

      Comment

      • Silencers
        Undisputed Champion
        Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
        • May 2006
        • 21957
        • 505
        • 235
        • 32,983

        #13
        They should go with 45-45 with 10% for the winner.

        Comment

        • MissDeeCole
          Boxing Scene Queen
          Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
          • Dec 2007
          • 1969
          • 117
          • 299
          • 8,888

          #14
          thats how it should be

          Comment

          • NakiFan
            Banned
            Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
            • Jan 2009
            • 6971
            • 435
            • 268
            • 9,796

            #15
            The problem with arrangements like this is that it will make the duckers even worse. Imagine telling a guy who doesn't want to fight for like 80 percent that he is going to get paid bugger all if he loses, it would be crazy. What we really need is for the governing bodies to grow a pair and make the best fight the best!

            Comment

            • Danny Gunz
              Smokin'
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Jul 2007
              • 10365
              • 520
              • 550
              • 19,983

              #16
              Originally posted by Infern0
              The problem with arrangements like this is that it will make the duckers even worse. Imagine telling a guy who doesn't want to fight for like 80 percent that he is going to get paid bugger all if he loses, it would be crazy. What we really need is for the governing bodies to grow a pair and make the best fight the best!
              yea thats true...

              imagine someday we might have two warriors though fighting where winner takes all that would be classic

              Comment

              Working...
              TOP