Winner gets 60 loser gets 40

[Danny Gunz]

i dont understand why that isnt the staple for most big fights, a simple, fair concept... in most fights unless its de la hoya its unfair to say one fighter brings more to the table

its crazy how boxing which has been around for so long can get outplayed by UFC who is like 10 years old on the business aspect of the sport

[hammerhiem]

how about they just both find someone else to fight.

At this point if I ever even hear the name Pacquiao again it will be too soon.

Shame that a great fighter has pissed me off so much that i don't ever want to see him in the ring again.

[warp1432]

Because sometimes the loser still brings in the money.

I think it should have been 50(Pac)-40(Hatton)-10, the winner getting the last 10.

[Danny Gunz]

Because sometimes the loser still brings in the money.

I think it should have been 50(Pac)-40(Hatton)-10, the winner getting the last 10.

yea but the winner earns the extra money by winning

[ACHlLLES]

Hatton won't accept winner get 60-40. Because he'll be the loser in the fight.

[MetalVomit]

That's a perfect solution.

[MANGLER]

I like the idea of a fight bein 40-40 wit the winner gettin the other 20. But given the difference in star power between so many fighters, no way it'd ever happen.

[el malo]

i dont understand why that isnt the staple for most big fights, a simple, fair concept... in most fights unless its de la hoya its unfair to say one fighter brings more to the table

its crazy how boxing which has been around for so long can get outplayed by UFC who is like 10 years old on the business aspect of the sport

great post, this is how all fights should be made. make them fight and earn the $$$

[MissDeeCole]

mayweather has pulled this same thing many times, he just hasn't had someone contest it like this

[Danny Gunz]

Hatton won't accept winner get 60-40. Because he'll be the loser in the fight.

honestly if you take a fight not expecting to win then you probably should not be taking the fight