If Marquez beats Diaz, Hatton vs Marquez will be made

Collapse
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • warp1432
    the mailman
    Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
    • Jul 2007
    • 14406
    • 478
    • 347
    • 24,060

    #1

    If Marquez beats Diaz, Hatton vs Marquez will be made

    At least I think so. Especially if Funeka beats Campbell. I'd be down with this fight. However I want to see Campbell vs Marquez if Campbell wins first.
  • Pullcounter
    no guts no glory
    Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
    • Jan 2004
    • 42582
    • 549
    • 191
    • 49,739

    #2
    Originally posted by warp1432
    At least I think so. Especially if Funeka beats Campbell. I'd be down with this fight. However I want to see Campbell vs Marquez if Campbell wins first.
    I prefer to see campbell vs the winner of jmm/diaz before they fight hatton.

    hatton thinks he's the next dlh now. what hatton needs to realize and learn from dlh's career is that money can't buy legacy.

    Comment

    • Addition
      Undisputed Champion
      Super Champion - 5,000-10,000 posts
      • Dec 2007
      • 8534
      • 306
      • 140
      • 20,828

      #3
      Originally posted by Pullcounter
      I prefer to see campbell vs the winner of jmm/diaz before they fight hatton.

      hatton thinks he's the next dlh now. what hatton needs to realize and learn from dlh's career is that money can't buy legacy.
      He thinks he's the new DLH? I never knew asking for 50/50 split means he's the new DLH.

      Comment

      • Zarco
        Undisputed Champion
        Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
        • May 2006
        • 4760
        • 184
        • 133
        • 12,032

        #4
        Originally posted by addition
        he thinks he's the new dlh? I never knew asking for 50/50 split means he's the new dlh.
        lol. +1



        ..

        Comment

        • Clegg
          Banned
          Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
          • Mar 2008
          • 24674
          • 3,726
          • 2,307
          • 233,274

          #5
          You are probably right.

          I think that Hatton is too big for JMM. I'd rather see JMM-Campbell and Hatton vs the winner of Holt/Bradley.

          I'm not too keen on these division-jumping matchups we keep seeing. I'd rather have the best in the division fight one another, even though the $$$ involved means that it probably won't happen.

          Comment

          • warp1432
            the mailman
            Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
            • Jul 2007
            • 14406
            • 478
            • 347
            • 24,060

            #6
            I'm not to keen on the division jumps either, but I like the idea of Hatton-Marquez. It's an intriging fight. However, 135 needs to be cleared out first. I think Campbell isn't getting past Funeka and so a Marquez-Fuenka match up probably won't happen.

            There is Marquez-Pacquiao III which would be great and that could happen in the summer, but I'm not to sure right away. Pacquiao could fight Valero in May. Marquez fights Hatton in June. They fight each other in the september granted they both win. I'm just trying to think of a logical timeline and I don't see it happening.

            If Campbell does beat Fuenka, I think Marquez-Campbell will happen in June and then Hatton will fight someone else in the meantime (Bradley-Holt winner or even Victor Ortiz).

            Pacquiao will fight Valero, or hopefully Mayweather, for May and then in the fall. I only see Hatton and Pacquiao fighting 2 times in 2009, which sucks.

            Comment

            • El Chicano
              Juan Hitter Quitter
              Unified Champion - 10,00-20,000 posts
              • Feb 2007
              • 10997
              • 375
              • 378
              • 17,954

              #7
              Originally posted by Clegg
              You are probably right.

              I think that Hatton is too big for JMM. I'd rather see JMM-Campbell and Hatton vs the winner of Holt/Bradley.

              I'm not too keen on these division-jumping matchups we keep seeing. I'd rather have the best in the division fight one another, even though the $$$ involved means that it probably won't happen.
              JMM is not big enough to be at his best against Hatton; Ricky's bigger. Manny can compete with slightly larger men; his body type is such that he can carry the weight a little better.

              Comment

              • Low Blow Armo
                Undisputed Champion
                • Oct 2008
                • 1092
                • 48
                • 0
                • 7,415

                #8
                JMM vs Campbell would be a thousand times better.

                Comment

                • Pullcounter
                  no guts no glory
                  Franchise Champion - 20,000+ posts
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 42582
                  • 549
                  • 191
                  • 49,739

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Addition
                  He thinks he's the new DLH? I never knew asking for 50/50 split means he's the new DLH.
                  read what I said in its context.

                  you can't buy legacy. dlh is known for coming up short in all his big fights. hatton is known for getting KTFO by floyd. money can't erase that legacy.

                  Comment

                  • King Koopa
                    Banned
                    Platinum Champion - 1,000-5,000 posts
                    • Oct 2007
                    • 1790
                    • 38
                    • 34
                    • 1,990

                    #10
                    Naw, Pac don't wanna 3rd fight with JMM

                    Winner of Campbell/Funeka vs Winner of Diaz/Marquez most likely

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    TOP