Collazo was NOT Robbed

[VatoMulatto]

True, it was a damn close fight that could've gone either way. But this is part of boxing after every close fight you have fans screaming "HE WAS ROBBED"......and then you ask how did you score the fight? "Well, I had it 114-113 he was clearly robbed"..WTF?

Berto and Collazo should do it again though cause this was one hellava fight. Hopefully we'll see a lot of fights like this in 2009. I have a feeling Mosley vs Margarito is going to be explosive and exciting to watch!!!!!!!!!!

[M.I Truth ?]

I think Collazo was robbed,1st off,he did lose the 12th.but for most of the fight he threw the 1-2 and landed those from the outside,then on the inside he was outhustling and outworking Berto,Berto had a few shots landed too,but everytime he threw the crowd was awing even if he did not land!!Collazo looked faster and had better balance,Berto's legs were way far apart,Berto got the point deduction as well theres just no way he won man!!

how did u score it round by round?

[Skylight]

It was a robbery, Collazo doesn't have any ****ing luck with scorecards.

[Derranged]

Just imagine the crying is Collazo was Mexican.

[sylvestersweet]

It all comes down to how you scored the sixth round IMO. The rest is easy
1) Collazo
2) Berto
3) Collazo
4) Collazo 10-8
5) Berto
6) Swing (I scored it for Collazo)
7) Berto
8) Berto
9) Collazo
10) Collazo
11) Berto
12) Berto

[Bushbaby]

how did u score it round by round?

I gave Berto the 1st,4,6,7,8 and 12th, Berto landed that body shot and Collazo had to back off and take a cupple rounds to recupperate,but his corner asked him to and he did regain control until the 12,when he ran out of gas,but still threw and made the bell.Dont get me wrong,it was a great fight,but after 12 hard rounds,they should'nt take away the fight because of b.s. politics!!

[sylvestersweet]

I gave Berto the 1st,4,6,7,8 and 12th, Berto landed that body shot and Collazo had to back off and take a cupple rounds to recupperate,but his corner asked him to and he did regain control until the 12,when he ran out of gas,but still threw and made the bell.Dont get me wrong,it was a great fight,but after 12 hard rounds,they should'nt take away the fight because of b.s. politics!!

You gave Berto the first and fourth round? Collazo the second and fifth?
Are you serious?
And how could you have scored the fight for Collazo if you switched a 10-8 Collazo round to a 10-9 to Berto and had Berto winning 5 other rounds? That means your card is a draw.

[MANGLER]

Wrong decision imo, but no, not a robbery.

[Gareth Ivanovic]

It was a close fight and Collazo definitley fought hard enough to win the fight and I wouldn't have been upset if he did, but the fight wasn't a robbery. I had it 7 rounds to 5 for Berto and the one point deduction making it 114-113.

[savorduhflavor]

You gave Berto the first and fourth round? Collazo the second and fifth?
Are you serious?
And how could you have scored the fight for Collazo if you switched a 10-8 Collazo round to a 10-9 to Berto and had Berto winning 5 other rounds? That means your card is a draw.

I thought the 1st round was a pretty clear Berto round. Collazo won 30 seconds of that round. Granted it was 30 seconds with an exclamation point, but Berto came back with vicious combos that were just as impressive as the left Collazo hit Berto with.

And as for the other 2 min of the round, Berto definitely got the better of it.