Collazo was NOT Robbed

[Derranged]

For those crying robbery, learn how to score a fight, seriously.

[Derranged]

Bump.......

[hookoutofhell]

any close fight these days is classed as a robbery

[-Antonio-]

**** no he wasnt. I'm still shocked at how many people were upset at the decision. Even in the first round where Berto was hurt, he came back and landed hard punches.

There were three or four rounds I saw clear for Collazo. The rest were either Berto or toss up.

[sylvestersweet]

I had the fight 114-113 for Collazo but there are a lot of reasons why this is not a robbery.
A) Round 6 was a swing round that I scored for Collazo. Compubox said that Berto landed ten more punches in that round. Scoring that round for Berto would make a scorecard like mine change to 114-113 for Berto.
B) The point deduction for holding was a bit extreme. There have been worse deductions but it really wasn't necessary
C) In the twelfth round, Collazo hits the canvas. It's questionable whether or not that's a slip or a legit knockdown with a delayed reaction but it's ruled a slip.
It was extremely close, without the deduction I would have the fight a draw and with the added point for what I thought should have been a knockdown Berto would be ahead on my scorecard 114-113.

[Welter_Skelter]

A close fight.. but again no robbery

[M.I Truth ?]

Just rewatched it. If you have Berto up by one point after eight like I did then it all makes sense. The reason I see people complaining the most is ovr the 111-116 score. That was wrong but it still doesn't make it a robery es****ally since the other two judges had the more common score. I also though Ledermans card was off. what was he thinking as far as the seventh? oh well. I accept those who have Louie winning by a point. that also was possible.

[Bushbaby]

I think Collazo was robbed,1st off,he did lose the 12th.but for most of the fight he threw the 1-2 and landed those from the outside,then on the inside he was outhustling and outworking Berto,Berto had a few shots landed too,but everytime he threw the crowd was awing even if he did not land!!Collazo looked faster and had better balance,Berto's legs were way far apart,Berto got the point deduction as well theres just no way he won man!!

[savorduhflavor]

The fight was no a robbery. I had it 114-113 Berto, but I could see Collazo winning.

I thought round 1 was a clear Berto round...

[kayjay]

**** no he wasnt. I'm still shocked at how many people were upset at the decision. Even in the first round where Berto was hurt, he came back and landed hard punches.

There were three or four rounds I saw clear for Collazo. The rest were either Berto or toss up.

He had FIVE very clear rounds. Whether he got the sixth he needed is up for debate, so I can't complain about the decision.